AccaMate logo

Football News

Latest Sports Stories

Filtered by tag:MediaClear filter
Fifa will not punish Fox for breaking advertising rules during World Cup opener

Football News

Fifa will not punish Fox for breaking advertising rules during World Cup opener

US broadcaster overran ads during hydration breakBroadcasts must return 30 seconds before play resumesFox will not face any sanction from Fifa for breaking the governing body’s advertising rules during the opening game of the World Cup between Mexico and South Africa last week.The US broadcaster broke Fifa’s strict guidelines for showing commercials during hydration breaks on the first occasion they were in operation by returning to the live action 10 seconds after play had resumed during the second half at Mexico City Stadium.Fifa’s tournament regulations, which were given to all rights holders two months ago, state that while broadcasters can show ads during hydration breaks they must return to the match 30 seconds before play resumes.While Fox’s commercials overran by 40 seconds, the broadcaster is understood to have provided an explanation to Fifa by claiming that it was unaware that referee Wilton Sampaio signaled a hydration break early after Raúl Jiménez scored Mexico’s second goal of the game, and that it was unaware it had been called. As a result Fox was late in cutting to its commercial breaks, which subsequently overran.While some viewers complained about Fox’s error, there have been no repeat incidents since. Telemundo, the World Cup’s Spanish-language broadcaster in the US, has opted not to cut away to full-screen advertising during hydration breaks, which last for three minutes and take place once in each half regardless of temperature.

Matt Hughes in MiamiSun, 14 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Fox’s full-screen ads during World Cup hydration breaks cause dismay in US: ‘Absolute nonsense’

Football News

Fox’s full-screen ads during World Cup hydration breaks cause dismay in US: ‘Absolute nonsense’

Breaks have been added at World Cup for player safetyFox missed small amount of action during breakFox is facing criticism from fans in the US after introducing full-screen adverts while players take hydration breaks during its World Cup broadcasts.While the breaks address legitimate concerns about players’ health, many fear they will disrupt the pace of play and allow broadcasters to extract added advertising revenue.Fox, which owns the English language broadcasting rights for the World Cup in the US, cut to an advertising break during the second-half of Mexico’s victory over South Africa in the tournament opener. The referee had called a hydration break just after Mexico had scored their second, and final, goal of the match. When the broadcast returned to the match, play had already resumed for around 10 seconds, meaning viewers had missed action as South Africa attempted to find a way back into the contest.The ad break received pushback from fans on social media. “We are trying to watch the biggest tournament on earth. Absolute nonsense. End this immediately!” wrote one viewer on X. On Reddit, fans were also critical although some said it was part of watching sport in the US. “Missing live action, which they did, is unacceptable. But commercial breaks during games are a fact of life in the US. It is what it is,” wrote one user.Telemundo, the World Cup’s Spanish-language broadcaster in the US, did not cut away to full-screen advertising during the hydration breaks.

Guardian sportFri, 12 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
ITV delivers feisty start to World Cup coverage – and taunts BBC from glitzy studio

Football News

ITV delivers feisty start to World Cup coverage – and taunts BBC from glitzy studio

Mark Pougatch acknowledged the controversies surrounding the tournament, while capturing the excitement of football fansDon’t mention the war. Mark Pougatch mentioned it, right at the start of ITV’s World Cup coverage, but I think he got away with it. He also, to his credit, highlighted the outrageous ticket prices, as well as the disgraceful treatment of the teams, fans and officials who now find themselves persona non grata in the US. Even Donald J Trump, the first (and quite possibly last) holder of the Fifa Peace Prize, got a mention. Pougatch also gave a visibly emotional Ian Wright the chance to suggest that the US has “no idea of the spirit of the game”. All unexpectedly and encouragingly feisty.Of course, it was no Gary Lineker, railing against the hosts’ human rights record while launching the BBC’s coverage of Qatar 2022. But Lineker is a corporation ghost now – no longer at the Beeb but podcasting for Netflix. The BBC have, on the grounds of cost, opted to present this World Cup from an austerity bunker in Salford. The Telegraph derided this as a “work from home” operation. ITV are already having some fun with it too.Pougatch began the broadcast striding ostentatiously through downtown New York. The studio, with interior vaguely resembling an open-plan version of the Friends apartment, offers “a great view of Lower Manhattan”. Take it down a notch, Mark. You’re presenting football from it, not trying to sell it to a merchant banker.Mystifyingly, there’s a second sofa situation on the roof, which involves Semra Hunter and Man v Food refugee Adam Richman offering lighthearted colour. At this early stage, it seems to exist only as a means of further taunting the BBC with the studio’s view of the Brooklyn Bridge, and may not survive a month in the irritable company of Roy Keane. Expect to see the sofa bobbing around in the Hudson River by the middle of next week.Anyway, enough of grumpy old Roy. It’s off to the Azteca Stadium in Mexico City (the US, of course, aren’t the only hosts) for Mexico v South Africa. We’re greeted by the insufferable rictus grin of Fifa’s Gianni Infantino, but let’s gloss over that. That’s because Jon Champion and Ally McCoist are there too, and McCoist in particular will not be dialling it down. This is a man who can hyperventilate with excitement over a UEFA Conference League tie between Crystal Palace and Shakhtar Donetsk. How on earth will he be coping with the opening game of a World Cup? Let’s just say he may be needing a new thesaurus.Still, there’s anticipation and emotion in the air and, in the context of the overpowering (and understandable) cynicism that dominated the buildup to this tournament, that’s refreshing. ITV managed just about the right balance between acknowledgment of the issues that seem likely to make this tournament a guilty watch for many, and excitement about the essence of it, which remains just about intact.Earlier, there was a discussion of the legendary 1970 final that was also played at the Azteca. Ian Wright positively glowed while talking about going round to a mate’s house and watching it in colour. ITV also showed a moving short film about Sir Geoff Hurst, the last man standing from the boys of 1966. It was a reminder that the World Cup is special to so many of us, and that is precisely why Fifa’s casual contempt for its magic has been so dismaying.We shouldn’t let them have it. At the start of the coverage, Pougatch said something charmingly gauche: “Essentially, football is great.” Deep down, everyone watching knows this to be true. It was for the best that the opening salvo of this tournament took place away from the oppressive air of 2026 US.This is Mexico and Canada’s party too, and for all of the problems – which ITV and the BBC must be brave enough to draw attention to when they arise – it’s still the World Cup. When Mexico took the lead, the electricity in the air was palpable. Sorry BBC, but being there may turn out to be important after all. Not even Donald Trump can ruin this. Can he?

Phil HarrisonThu, 11 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
David Sullivan’s Sport newspapers used sexualised images of underage girls as ‘bait for predatory men’

Football News

David Sullivan’s Sport newspapers used sexualised images of underage girls as ‘bait for predatory men’

Former victims’ commissioner says publication ‘deliberately came as close as possible to breaking the law’David Sullivan’s Sport newspapers used sexualised images of underage girls as “bait for predatory men”, the former victims’ commissioner has said.Vera Baird spoke amid scrutiny of the newspapers’ ’Countdown to 16’ feature, where during Sullivan’s tenure as owner, models were pictured in lingerie and bikinis in the weeks before their 16th birthdays, until they could legally be shown topless.Sullivan, 77, announced his resignation as a director and co-chair of West Ham on Saturday, before the publication of a joint investigation by the BBC and the Times in which seven women accused him of sexual misconduct.Three women claimed that the former pornography baron abused his power as the owner of the Daily and Sunday Sport newspapers to prey on them for sex when they were seeking work. A further four accused him of exploitative and predatory behaviour, including allegations he tried to pressure them into sex during business meetings.Through his lawyers, Sullivan has “categorically” denied the allegations, which the BBC and Times said spanned decades, starting in the 1980s and involving women in their late teens and early 20s.He added: “After a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry, in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me.”Sullivan founded the Sunday Sport in 1986, followed by the Daily Sport in 1991. For more than 15 years, the titles celebrated the 16th birthdays of young models by showing them semi-naked. Some appeared in sexualised shoots in the weeks before they turned 16.One 15-year-old model who appeared in the Sunday Sport was photographed with just her hands covering her chest. The newspaper also printed drawings of how its readers imagined another 15-year-old girl would look topless.“The age rules are there to protect vulnerable children from exploitation, but this inverts that protection by using under aged girls in sexualised images, as bait for predatory men,” Baird said.“It is deliberately coming as close as possible to breaking the law to show it is naughty but nice to like children. [Sullivan is] not a man who should have any safeguarding responsibilities and hard to see how he ought ever to have had control of a newspaper.”At the time, the Sport maintained it had acted legally, by not showing the girls fully topless until they reached 16. The law changed in 2004, meaning it is now illegal to show indecent images of anyone under 18.Sullivan remains West Ham’s largest shareholder despite his resignation as co-chair and director. The new football regulator could force him to sell his 38.8% stake in the east London club.The IFR, introduced under last year’s Football Governance Act, is the game’s independent watchdog and oversees its own owners, directors and senior executives (ODSE) regime for clubs across the Premier League and English Football League. It has the power to expel any figures it considers unsuitable.An IFR spokesperson said: “These are extremely serious allegations. We are in contact with West Ham on this matter and will use our statutory powers to seek urgent information from David Sullivan relating to his suitability under our owners, directors and senior executives regime. We are unable to comment further at this stage.”The former Home Office minister Alex Davies-Jones questioned whether Sullivan should have been allowed to play a powerful role in football given his previous business practices.He has been a prominent figure in the English game for more than 30 years. Before his involvement with West Ham, he co-owned Birmingham City.Davies-Jones said she acknowledged that Sullivan had not broken the law via his ownership of the Sport but had failed to show any insight into the wider societal impact of some of its content.Some models who appeared in the newspapers at 16 said their glamour modelling careers affected their education, or had a detrimental effect on their mental health.Davies-Jones said: “Times change and public cultures and attitudes move on but he himself has not seemed to have any contrition for his behaviour.“That speaks to more of his character. He hasn’t acknowledged how deeply troubling that behaviour, that culture [was to] us all as a society.“There is no atonement, no contrition, no recognition of [how] that business model fuels a culture of violence against women and girls.”Lawyers for Sullivan did not respond to a request for comment.

Emine Sinmaz, Geraldine McKelvie and Jacob SteinbergTue, 09 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Football regulator could force David Sullivan to sell West Ham stake

Football News

Football regulator could force David Sullivan to sell West Ham stake

Former pornographer, who owns 38.8% of club, has been accused of sexually exploitative and predatory behaviourThe football regulator could force David Sullivan to sell his stake in West Ham United after the former pornography billionaire was accused of sexually exploitative and predatory behaviour against women over several decades.The 77-year-old announced his resignation as a director and co-chair of the football club on Saturday, ahead of a joint investigation by the BBC and the Times reporting on seven women accusing him of sexual misconduct.Three women alleged Sullivan abused his power as the owner of the Sport newspapers to prey on them for sex when they were seeking work. A further four women accused Sullivan of exploitative and predatory behaviour, including allegations he tried to pressure them into sex during business meetings.The BBC and Times said their reporters had spoken to dozens of former models and industry insiders, with some sources alleging Sullivan was known for “casting couch” behaviour.Sullivan has denied the allegations, which the BBC and Times said spanned decades, starting in the 1980s and involving women in their late teens and early 20s. Through his lawyers, Sullivan said: “I categorically deny all of these complaints.”He added: “After a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry, in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me.” He did not respond to follow-up queries from the Guardian.Sullivan, who remains the largest shareholder at West Ham with 38.8%, has been a prominent figure in English football for more than 30 years. English football’s new Independent Football Regulator said the allegations were “extremely serious” and confirmed it was seeking further information from Sullivan.The IFR, introduced under last year’s Football Governance Act, is the game’s independent watchdog and oversees its own owners, directors and senior executives (ODSE) regime for clubs across the Premier League and English Football League. It has the power to expel any figures it considers unsuitable. “Honesty and integrity” assessments of owners are part of its remit.An IFR spokesperson said: “These are extremely serious allegations. We are in contact with West Ham on this matter and will use our statutory powers to seek urgent information from David Sullivan relating to his suitability under our owners, directors and senior executives regime. We are unable to comment further at this stage.”Sullivan bought a 50% stake in West Ham with his business partner, the late David Gold, in January 2010. It remains to be seen whether he tries to hold on to his stake, although a source close to Sullivan has indicated he is open to selling up. His sons, Jack and Dave Jr, remain directors at West Ham. Sullivan did not address questions from the Guardian about whether he would sell his stake or try to pass it on to his sons.It is unclear if Daniel Křetínský, a Czech billionaire who owns a 27% stake in the club, will look to increase his shareholding. Plans for Křetínský and Sullivan both to buy a portion of the Gold family’s 25.1% shares in West Ham and become equal partners in the boardroom were put on ice after the club’s relegation from the Premier League last month.West Ham are in financial trouble after dropping into the Championship and posting a loss of £104.2m last year. Several executives have left the club in recent months, most notably Karren Brady, who stepped down as vice-chair in April.

Jacob SteinbergTue, 09 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Revealed: David Sullivan’s Sunday Sport sold sexualised images of 15-year-old girls

Football News

Revealed: David Sullivan’s Sunday Sport sold sexualised images of 15-year-old girls

Sunday Sport’s ‘Countdown to 16’ used revealing photoshoots with young girls to trail topless pictures published after their 16th birthdaysIn 1987, the tabloid press in Britain was at the peak of its powers. The Sun newspaper, with its brash celebrity scoops and strident support for Margaret Thatcher – who won her third general election that year – was selling almost 4m copies a day.Competition for stories and readers was relentless, resulting in ever more salacious and lurid editorial devices to win a slice of the readership from rivals on the newsstand. The Sun stood atop the tabloid market, its topless Page 3- girls credited with a share of its popularity. It was against this backdrop that the Sunday Sport, a red-top publication occupying the seediest corner of Fleet Street, launched a feature that even by its own standards appeared to plumb the depths of journalistic ethics.On 6 September 1987, the newspaper began counting down to the 16th birthday of schoolgirl Natalie Banus – when she could legally be pictured topless.Owned by the pornography baron David Sullivan, who announced his resignation as a joint-chair and director of West Ham this weekend, the Sunday Sport had launched in the previous year in a blaze of controversy.Its coverage of Banus coincided with a short-lived and ill-fated merger with its ailing rival, the Daily Star – the Sunday Sport was briefly rebranded as the Star Sunday Sport – and together they devoted countless column inches to the teenager they described as “the sexiest 15-year-old in Britain”, measuring “a fantastic 40-22-34”.When Banus, from Hendon, north London, first appeared in the Sunday Sport, the newspaper pushed the law to its limits by picturing her semi-naked, her chest obscured only by her arms. The law at the time forbid the publication of indecent images of under 16s. The Sunday Sport insisted it was compliant with the rules as Banus was “not quite topless”.It described 15 as being “the age of the nymphet” and proclaimed Banus “the sexiest Lolita of them all”. Fully topless pictures of Banus, from Hendon, north London, were duly published in the Daily Star when she turned 16 a month later. The Sunday Sport also encouraged its readers to call a premium-rate chat line to have a chance of hearing her voice.Almost 40 years on from her tabloid debut, Banus reflected on her glamour modelling career in a memoir, Dark Star, published earlier this year. “The Sunday Sport wished me a good [birthday] and told readers that I was legal, meaning that I could both show my boobs and that anyone who had sex with me no longer had to fear they might be arrested,” she said.Banus, who had hoped to be a ballet dancer before being scouted by a glamour photographer, said she wept when she read the pieces published in anticipation of her birthday. One Daily Star piece included an account of an alleged incident in a changing room where she said she feared a teenage boy would sexually assault her. After she turned 16 on 11 October, she recalled that the Daily Star ran topless pictures of her “all week … always paired with some nonsense story about me being so proud of my tits, getting groped or fantasising about sex”.This led to more work with Sullivan’s magazines and newspapers, with some of her explicit shoots taking place in his former home in Essex, she said. In her memoir, Banus said that Sullivan told her she was “a cut above so many models” and “dynamite” when it came to selling papers.Sullivan’s career in the adult entertainment industry has been thrown into sharp focus this weekend, after he announced he was standing down as a director and co-chair of West Ham to apply his “full energy and attention” to fighting what he described as “false allegations” concerning his personal conduct. The claims have apparently been gathered as part of a joint investigation by BBC Panorama and the Times and are due to be published on Monday.Sullivan did not elaborate on the accusations he is facing, but said: “After a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry, in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me.” He did not respond to follow up queries from the Guardian.Despite her condemnation of the newspapers she featured in, Banus has always stopped short of criticising Sullivan personally and has never made any allegations about his behaviour towards her. In her book, she said: “While opinions on him may vary, I say with honesty that he has shown me courtesy and kindness in our dealings.” After the news of Sullivan’s departure from West Ham broke, Banus reiterated that he had “always treated [her] with respect and courtesy.”While the relationship between the Star and the Sport lasted just eight weeks – it was reported that advertisers and journalists began to vote with their feet, largely in protest at the seedy influence of Sullivan – he was undeterred. The Sunday Sport and its sister paper, the Daily Sport, continued for more than 15 years to celebrate the 16th birthdays of teenage girls by picturing them topless.The images were often published alongside the newspapers’ famously outlandish stories. (They claimed a London bus had been found at the south pole, and that aliens had turned a man into a fish finger.) Some teenage models became staples of their pages for years to come, but others retreated from the limelight, bruised by the sudden exposure to the sleaziest end of Britain’s newspaper market. Some young women were encouraged to share details of their supposed sexual experiences, which several later alleged were exaggerated or simply made up.On 3 July 1994, the Sunday Sport pictured a bikini-clad Linsey Dawn McKenzie, from Wallington, south London, beneath the headline: “Please print my boobs when I’m 16.” It told its readers that “stunning schoolgirl” McKenzie, who went on to be one of the country’s most high-profile glamour models, was 15 years, 10 months, three weeks and four days old – meaning there were just under six weeks to go until her milestone birthday. It said that for “legal reasons” it wouldn’t show her fully topless until she was 16.McKenzie, who recently retired from glamour modelling after more than three decades, featured in the newspaper every week until she turned 16. As the weeks ticked past, it encouraged its readers to draw pictures of how they imagined McKenzie would look topless and printed its favourites. It dished out coupons so its clientele could pre-order copies of its 14 August edition, where it was promised McKenzie would reveal all.“Here she is at last, folks,” the newspaper said, when the day finally arrived. “Lovely Linsey Dawn McKenzie – sweet sixteen and stripped bare for YOU.”On 17 May 1998, it was Zoe Parker’s turn. Parker, who had been scouted just weeks earlier when her stepfather, Bob, took her to a pornography fair, appeared topless in the Sunday Sport next to the headline: “I’m sweet 16 and I can’t get enough.” The accompanying article was replete with details about her supposedly outrageous sex life. The ensuing furore saw Parker, living in Stamford, Lincolnshire, expelled from school.The next year, Parker told the Sunday People that she had been coerced into glamour modelling by Bob and that it had driven her to the brink of suicide. “I was lonely, frightened and couldn’t carry on,” she said. “I couldn’t take any more and I thought the only way was to kill myself.”Parker later claimed that some of the things she had said in the media about her sexual experiences were “rubbish” but alleged she was encouraged to invent stories by her stepfather who thought it “great publicity”. For his part, Bob said he had “only tried to encourage my daughter to do what she wanted to do”.The Sport newspapers also profited from adverts for videos involving 16-year-old girls well into the 00s. In 2002, they ran a series of promotions for “incredibly hardcore” pornographic videos involving “barely legal” teenagers, some of whom they claimed were in school uniforms or had been filmed having sex for the first time.One of the last 16-year-old models to grace its pages was Cherry Frampton, from Buckley, north Wales, who appeared under the name Cherry Dee. Scouted at 15, she first appeared topless in the Sunday Sport on 10 August 2003, next to the headline: “Happy 16th bare-day”. An advert in the Daily Sport the previous day, showing Frampton in lingerie and suspenders, said: “She’s sweet 16 and just left school, her boobs are 32E and still growing. Tomorrow, only in the Sunday Sport, she’s getting them out!”At 20 years old, six months after being crowned Miss Sunday Sport 2007, Frampton gave up glamour modelling to train as a nurse. Speaking about the glamour industry more generally, she later told the Wales on Sunday newspaper that she was concerned about some models openly doing cocaine on shoots, adding that, for some of her peers it was a gateway to sex work. “Loads of them worked as strippers, in lapdancing clubs and as escorts, some of them even selling sex,” Frampton said. “I know a lot of them were tempted into porn but I wasn’t hungry for all that.”A change in the law in 2004 – making it illegal to publish indecent images of under-18s – sounded the death knell for Sullivan’s countdown to 16. However, for several years, the internet has been awash with rumours about how he treated both the young models who were handpicked to adorn the Sport’s pages and other women and girls he came into contact with.Sullivan is a man who has been making money from the sex industry for decades. Born in Cardiff in 1949, he moved to Hornchurch, Essex, at the age of 11. After graduating with a degree in economics from Queen Mary College, University of London, he began selling explicit photos via a small mail-order business he established in the east end of London in the early 1970s. A string of sex shops and pornographic magazines followed.“I was incredibly lucky, because I was getting raided by Scotland Yard weekly, but we became very chummy with them,” Sullivan recalled in a Channel 4 documentary, broadcast in 2024. “The head of the obscene publications squad came to see me one day and said: ‘I’m going to help you. Now, as long as you avoid bondage, you won’t face prosecution.’ That allowed me to do things other magazines weren’t doing. We charged on, and destroyed the market.”By 25, Sullivan was a millionaire, and decided to branch into films. The first, and most successful, was 1977’s Come Play With Me, starring Sullivan’s then girlfriend, Mary Millington. She took her own life in 1979, after a series of raids on a sex shop she operated in south London, saying she felt “beaten” by the police. She left a suicide note for Sullivan, asking him to push for more pornography to be legalised. Sullivan continued to distribute pornographic footage of her after her death, apparently in tribute to her.Sullivan described Come Play With Me as “a Carry On film with tits and bums and pubic hair”.“I had made a pile of money and I thought, I fancy making a movie for a bit of fun,” he told Channel 4. “Within a week, we were filming.”Come Play With Me was marketed as the “strongest sex comedy film ever produced and distributed in Britain”. The press reported at the time that some actors went on strike because the final cut was far more explicit than they had anticipated.As Sullivan’s notoriety grew, so did his apparent demands on the young women he encountered. Several have since spoken publicly about how he would expect sexual favours in exchange for work. Vicki Scott, a former glamour model and Marilyn Monroe lookalike, recalled her first encounter with Sullivan in the late 1970s, in an interview with the Sunday People.“I’ll never forget when I was about 19 and I went to see him for the first time about a magazine job,” Scott said, speaking in 1987. “After telling me to strip off, he tried it on and I would not have it. He said: ‘That’s how it is if you want to work with me.’” Scott, then 29, told the newspaper that she had tried to warn other aspiring models about Sullivan. “I’d tell the girls: ‘Look, you can see Dave, but you’ll probably have to sleep with him,’” she said.At the time, Sullivan did not address Scott’s comments directly but said he was declaring “war” on the Sunday People, and reportedly told its journalists:” “If your editor wants to delve into my private life, I will delve into his.”In 1981, the News of the World was contacted by Sue Stewart, a 24-year-old secretary who said she had answered an advertisement for a £150-a-night job carrying out “promotional entertainment work”. In an interview with the newspaper, Stewart said Sullivan had asked her to undress, then tried to have sex with her. When she refused, he reportedly said: “If you aren’t going to do anything, it’s like a boxer without any training. I don’t know what you can do.”The News of the World then asked an undercover reporter, Tina Dalgleish, to respond to a similar advert. When she arrived at Sullivan’s then home in Chigwell, Essex, she said he wanted to know whether she was “interested in doing anything sexually” for money.According to Dalgleish, Sullivan said: “We’re not going to persuade you to do anything you don’t want to do. But do you want to get up to no good or not? I mean, my time is valuable.” She said he invited her to his bedroom, where he suggested they have sex so he could “judge her performance”. Dalgleish wrote that she made her excuses and left. Sullivan does not appear to have commented on the story at the time.The next year, Sullivan was convicted of living off the immoral earnings of prostitutes after two London saunas he operated were raided by police. Mark Killick, a journalist who wrote a book about Sullivan published in 1994, said the women working there were “poorly paid and exploited”. Sullivan was ordered to serve nine months in prison, but was freed after 71 days when he successfully appealed against the length of his sentence.After his release, Sullivan tried to distance himself from the more extreme fringes of the sex industry. He set his sights on two longstanding ambitions: owning a newspaper and a football club.The Sunday Sport was launched in 1986, followed by the Daily Sport in 1991. As most businesses would not advertise in the newspapers, their pages were filled with promotions for premium sex chat lines, reportedly controlled by Sullivan and staffed by some of the models who featured in the newspapers.Sullivan sold his stake in the Sport newspapers in 2007 in a deal that earned him about £40m, but bought back some shares in 2011 in an apparent effort to save them after the company entered administration.His big move into football came when took over Birmingham City in 1993 with his business partner David Gold, whose family founded the Ann Summers empire. To the astonishment of the footballing world, he appointed 23-year-old Karren Brady, an unknown Sport advertising executive, as its managing director, launching a career that would culminate in a peerage and a starring role alongside Alan Sugar in the long-running BBC series The Apprentice. She severed her decades-long business relationship with Sullivan in April, resigning as vice-chair of West Ham United.This is not the first time there have been questions surrounding Sullivan’s behaviour. In July 2008, he was arrested on suspicion of sexually assaulting a 25-year-old actor who had visited his mansion in Theydon Bois, Essex. He denied the woman’s claims and, after an investigation lasting almost three months, the police decided to take no further action in light of advice from the Crown Prosecution Service.In a later interview with the Birmingham Mail, Sullivan claimed the encounter was consensual. “Anybody can make an allegation against anybody in this country and the police have to investigate,” he said. “I’m a rich person, so I’m a target for this sort of thing. That is the world we live in.”Sullivan and Gold sold Birmingham City shortly afterwards, buying West Ham United in early 2010. Sullivan’s former long-term partner, the one-time pornography actor and Sport glamour model Emma Benton-Hughes, with whom he has two adult sons, briefly served on the club’s board. Under his ownership, the club won its first trophy in 43 years, clinching the Uefa Conference League title with a 2-1 win over Fiorentina in 2023.However, in recent years, fans have become increasingly dissatisfied with his stewardship of the club. Their anger reached boiling point last month when the team was relegated from the Premier League. The crowd was vocal in its condemnation when Sullivan attended last month’s game against Leeds United with his reality television star fiancee, Ampika Pickston. He plans to marry Pickston, who features in the ITV series The Real Housewives of Cheshire and is 32 years his junior, next year.Over the coming days, the past exploits of a man who has made his vast personal wealth from the sexualised images of young women and girls, and pushing the law to its limits in order to publish the most extreme content possible, will likely face intense scrutiny.His history has not precluded him from reaching the pinnacle of British sport, a position from which, for many years, he exercised control over not just a prominent football club, but its women’s team and academy system for children. Despite his resignation, he retains significant financial influence over the club as its largest shareholder. Whether that position will remain tenable as full details of the allegations he faces emerge remains to be seen.

Geraldine McKelvie, Emine Sinmaz, Jacob Steinberg and Kate MeadMon, 08 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story