AccaMate logo

Football News

Latest Sports Stories

Filtered by tag:David SullivanClear filter
Kretinsky set to become West Ham‘s biggest shareholder and addresses Sullivan allegations

Football News

Kretinsky set to become West Ham‘s biggest shareholder and addresses Sullivan allegations

Czech billionaire to increase his stake from 27% to 43%Kretinsky and Gold ‘deeply concerned’ by revelationsDaniel Kretinsky, the owner of Royal Mail, is set to overtake David Sullivan as West Ham’s largest shareholder after agreeing to buy an additional stake in the club from the Gold family. The Czech billionaire has moved to increase his power at West Ham after Sullivan stepped down as a director and co-chair of the club last Saturday, before a joint investigation by the Times and Panorama reporting on seven women accusing him of abusing his power and preying on them for sex in claims that date back to the 1980s and 90s.Kretinsky will increase his stake from 27% to 43% after agreeing to buy a portion of shares from Vanessa Gold, who inherited her 25% stake after the death of her father, David Gold, in January 2023.Gold and Kretinsky have said the deal will be ratified in the next few weeks and revealed they have “agreed to vote jointly on key matters and to support the strategy targeting an immediate return to the Premier League”.West Ham are in major financial difficulties after their relegation last month, and Kretinsky intends to inject capital in an attempt to help Nuno Espirito Santo, the club’s manager, build a squad capable of winning promotion.Sullivan, who categorically denies all of the allegations against him, has been the club’s largest shareholder until now and was the most influential figure at West Ham. It remains unclear if Sullivan intends to sell his 38.8% stake, although that decision could be taken out of his hands if the Independent Football Regulator decides to follow its preliminary inquiries into the allegations against the 77-year-old.The IFR has the power to force the former pornography baron to divest his shares if it concludes he no longer meets the required standards of honesty and integrity to own a football club. A nonexecutive director on the IFR, Tara Warren, has been removed from any potential investigation into Sullivan to avoid conflict of interest. Warren was a senior director of West Ham until February.Kretinsky, who became a shareholder at West Ham after paying £150m for a stake from Sullivan and David Gold in 2021, will face a battle to lift morale and get the club back on track.A source with knowledge of the club’s inner workings described the situation behind the scenes as a “mess”. West Ham made a loss of £104.2m last year and need to raise more than £100m in transfer sales, raising the prospect of them losing key talent such as Jarrod Bowen, Mateus Fernandes and Crysencio Summerville. They do not have a sporting director and their head of technical recruitment, Max Hahn, has handed in his resignation.Kretinsky and Gold released a statement on Saturday morning saying they were “deeply concerned” by the allegations made by the Times and Panorama. A source said it was not until 21 May that Sullivan informed the full board at West Ham of the potential of the story concerning his alleged behaviour towards women being published.It was only after relegation to the Championship that board members were also told Sullivan has been restricted from interacting with West Ham’s women and youth teams since 2023 after a safeguarding inquiry by the Football Association. The women’s team were not aware of the restrictions imposed on Sullivan. It is understood this followed the FA receiving a complaint about a historical allegation dating back to the 198os, which Sullivan has denied.Kretinsky and Gold said: “We were deeply concerned by the revelations made by The Times and Panorama this week and our thoughts go out to those women who have fought so hard to make their voices heard. Any abuse of power is abhorrent, and it takes great courage and determination to speak up against it.“As shareholders and directors of West Ham, our focus is now firmly on protecting the future of this football club. Our goal is to stabilise West Ham United, retain as many of our key players as possible and, under the management of Nuno Espírito Santo, secure an immediate return to the Premier League. We are also committed to engaging with our fans and all business partners to build a stronger future for our club. We have already taken concrete steps toward this goal.“As such, we have reached agreement on the key terms of a share purchase transaction between the Gold family and 1890 Holdings, which, subject to other shareholders’ pre-emption rights and necessary approvals, would make 1890 Holdings (part of the broader group EP) the largest shareholder in West Ham with an approximately 43% stake. As the largest shareholder, group EP will be able to provide the additional financing the club needs.”

Jacob SteinbergSat, 13 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Ex-West Ham director would not be in involved in inquiry into David Sullivan

Football News

Ex-West Ham director would not be in involved in inquiry into David Sullivan

Tara Warren of the Independent Football Regulator was an executive director at West Ham until DecemberA nonexecutive director of the Independent Football Regulator will not be involved in the inquiry into allegations of sexual misconduct against David Sullivan to avoid a conflict of interest over her links to West Ham.Tara Warren was an executive director of West Ham United and the club’s women’s team before joining the football regulator.Sullivan announced his resignation as a director and co-chair of West Ham last Saturday, before the publication of a joint investigation in which seven women accused him of abusing his power and preying on them for sex, in claims that date back to the 1980s and 1990s.However, the 77-year-old remains the club’s largest shareholder, with a 38.8% stake, and the regulator is seeking clarity around the situation before launching a potential investigation. English football’s regulatory body has called the allegations “extremely serious” and has been given statutory powers to force a club owner to divest their shares should they be deemed unsuitable.Sullivan has faced restrictions on his contact with West Ham’s women and youth teams since 2023 because of a safeguarding investigation by the Football Association. He has described the restriction as “meaningless and did not amount to a ban” and that he accepted it “for a quiet life”.West Ham issued a statement on Thursday saying that the safeguarding measures followed the club’s safeguarding policy, as agreed with the FA and the local authority. The club added that “only a very limited number of West Ham United employees were informed of these measures”. The Guardian reported this week that the women’s team were now aware of the restrictions imposed on Sullivan.Warren, who left the club last December, was appointed as a director of the women’s team in February 2023. She joined West Ham as a marketing director in 2009 and became an executive director in 2014. Warren was a close ally of Karren Brady, who stepped down as West Ham’s vice-chair in April.Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, appointed Warren as one of five non-executive directors of the regulator in February. The Guardian asked the Independent Football Regulator and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport about a potential conflict of interest and if Warren’s previous links with West Ham would see her recused from any investigation into Sullivan.A spokesperson for the regulator said: “The IFR has robust policies and processes in place to ensure any interests that may conflict with the responsibilities of board members are known and managed accordingly. Where a board member does have a conflict or perceived conflict of interest, they will be recused from any decision making role relating to the matter.”Warren denies being aware of the allegations made against Sullivan before their publication this week. Through his lawyers, Sullivan has denied the allegations against him.Sullivan is believed to be open to selling his stake. Daniel Kretinsky, West Ham’s second largest shareholder, is interested in taking a majority stake. The Czech billionaire could do so by buying the Gold family’s 25% stake.

Jacob SteinbergFri, 12 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
West Ham women’s team not told of David Sullivan’s restricted access to them

Football News

West Ham women’s team not told of David Sullivan’s restricted access to them

Sources say it would have breached regulations to tell WSL or team details of safeguarding investigation into SullivanNeither the Women’s Super League nor West Ham United women’s team were aware of the restrictions placed on David Sullivan’s interaction with the team, the Guardian has learned. Sullivan, who is West Ham’s largest shareholder, has faced restrictions on his contact with the women’s team and their youth teams since 2023 because of a safeguarding investigation.The Football Association opened an inquiry in the same year after receiving a complaint, which the Guardian understands was an allegation of sexual misconduct unrelated to football. In a joint investigation by the BBC and the Times, seven women accused the 77-year-old of predatory behaviour, with alleged incidents dating back to the 1980s. Through his lawyers, Sullivan has said he denies the allegations. Sources close to the playing squad at West Ham’s women’s side have said the team are appalled by the allegations, which they were not aware of before the story broke this week.Separate sources, however, said that it would have been a breach of the local authority’s safeguarding regulations for the league, players or staff to be informed of the details of an ongoing safeguarding case.A West Ham spokesperson said on Wednesday that the club had “clear and robust safeguarding measures in place, measures that are independently assessed and audited on an annual basis”, but the club could not comment on individual cases. An FA spokesperson said: “We take all safeguarding allegations and concerns very seriously, and we investigate each case within our jurisdiction thoroughly. “The aim of our process is to safeguard children and adults at risk, and we are unable to comment on individual safeguarding matters, including cases that remain active.”Sullivan resigned as a West Ham director and co-chair of the recently relegated men’s Championship club before the publication of the claims about his conduct. Sullivan has never been listed as a director of West Ham United Women Football Club Limited on Companies House. His son, Jack Sullivan, was a director of the women’s club’s company between November 2017 and May 2021 and was the focus of a behind the scenes BBC documentary that followed the women’s team’s progress, titled Britain’s youngest football boss, in 2018. West Ham finished 10th in this season’s WSL, a division run independently by WSL Football since 2024 after leaving the FA, which had organised the division since 2011. David Sullivan said in a statement on Wednesday: “I wish to clarify recent media reports regarding a negotiated agreement with the FA, which has been inaccurately described as a disciplinary ‘ban’. In my entire 16 years at [West Ham], I have never met any academy or women’s team players [one to one], therefore a negotiated and temporary agreement with the FA not to do so until the FA resolved an outstanding complaint in relation to a single anonymous complaint regarding an event in 1981 was entered into. “The complaint had nothing to do [with] my time in football and it never happened. I saw it as a meaningless restriction, as it didn’t impact on my work in any way, therefore I accepted it for a quiet life.”

Tom GarryThu, 11 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
David Sullivan’s contact with West Ham women’s and youth teams restricted since 2023

Football News

David Sullivan’s contact with West Ham women’s and youth teams restricted since 2023

‘Temporary agreement’ in place since Football Association safeguarding investigation began three years agoDavid Sullivan has faced restrictions on his contact with West Ham’s women’s and youth teams since 2023 because of a safeguarding investigation.The Football Association began an inquiry three years ago after receiving a complaint, which the Guardian understands involves an allegation of sexual misconduct unrelated to football.Sullivan, the club’s largest shareholder, said through lawyers on Wednesday morning that the restrictions were part of a “negotiated and temporary agreement”. The 77-year-old billionaire added that the safeguarding investigation related to a “single anonymous complaint” from an “event in 1981” that he says “never happened”.Sullivan announced his resignation as a director and co-chair of West Ham on Saturday, before the publication of a joint investigation by the BBC and the Times in which seven women accused him of abusing his power and preying on them for sex, in claims that date back to the 1980s and 1990s.He retains his financial stake in the east London club, though he could be forced to sell his shares by the football regulator, which described the allegations as “extremely serious”.Three women claimed that the former pornography baron had abused his power as the owner of the Daily and Sunday Sport newspapers to prey on them for sex when they were seeking work. A further four accused him of exploitative and predatory behaviour, including allegations he had tried to pressure them into sex during business meetings.Through his lawyers, Sullivan has “categorically” denied the allegations, which the BBC and Times said involved women then in their late teens and early 20s.Sullivan said: “After a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry, in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me.”In a new statement issued on Wednesday morning, Sullivan said: “I wish to clarify recent media reports regarding a negotiated agreement with the Football Association (FA), which has been inaccurately described as a disciplinary ‘ban’.“In my entire 16 years at [West Ham] I have never met any academy or women’s team players [one to one], therefore a negotiated and temporary agreement with the FA not to do so until the FA resolved an outstanding complaint in relation to a single anonymous complaint regarding an event in 1981 was entered into.“The complaint had nothing to do [with] my time in football and it never happened. I saw it as a meaningless restriction, as it didn’t impact on my work in any way, therefore I accepted it for a quiet life.”On Tuesday evening, Lisa Nandy, the culture, media and sport secretary, described the latest revelations as “utterly horrifying”.She said: “If it is the case that an investigation concluded that there were sufficiently serious allegations to warrant a ban on contact with the youth and women’s teams, then the FA must explain this decision and why no further action was taken. I expect a full and urgent explanation from the FA and West Ham as to how these incredibly serious allegations have been handled.”A spokesperson for West Ham said the club could not comment on individual cases but that it had “clear and robust safeguarding measures in place, measures that are independently assessed and audited on an annual basis”.The FA has not clarified whether the safeguarding investigation has been resolved. A spokesperson said: “We take all safeguarding allegations and concerns very seriously, and we investigate each case within our jurisdiction thoroughly.“Appropriate action is always taken against individuals who pose or may pose a risk of harm to children and adults at risk in football. This includes issuing appropriate suspensions in accordance with our safeguarding regulations.“The aim of our process is to safeguard children and adults at risk, and we are unable to comment on individual safeguarding matters, including cases that remain active.”

Jacob Steinberg, Geraldine McKelvie and Emine SinmazWed, 10 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
David Sullivan’s Sport newspapers used sexualised images of underage girls as ‘bait for predatory men’

Football News

David Sullivan’s Sport newspapers used sexualised images of underage girls as ‘bait for predatory men’

Former victims’ commissioner says publication ‘deliberately came as close as possible to breaking the law’David Sullivan’s Sport newspapers used sexualised images of underage girls as “bait for predatory men”, the former victims’ commissioner has said.Vera Baird spoke amid scrutiny of the newspapers’ ’Countdown to 16’ feature, where during Sullivan’s tenure as owner, models were pictured in lingerie and bikinis in the weeks before their 16th birthdays, until they could legally be shown topless.Sullivan, 77, announced his resignation as a director and co-chair of West Ham on Saturday, before the publication of a joint investigation by the BBC and the Times in which seven women accused him of sexual misconduct.Three women claimed that the former pornography baron abused his power as the owner of the Daily and Sunday Sport newspapers to prey on them for sex when they were seeking work. A further four accused him of exploitative and predatory behaviour, including allegations he tried to pressure them into sex during business meetings.Through his lawyers, Sullivan has “categorically” denied the allegations, which the BBC and Times said spanned decades, starting in the 1980s and involving women in their late teens and early 20s.He added: “After a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry, in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me.”Sullivan founded the Sunday Sport in 1986, followed by the Daily Sport in 1991. For more than 15 years, the titles celebrated the 16th birthdays of young models by showing them semi-naked. Some appeared in sexualised shoots in the weeks before they turned 16.One 15-year-old model who appeared in the Sunday Sport was photographed with just her hands covering her chest. The newspaper also printed drawings of how its readers imagined another 15-year-old girl would look topless.“The age rules are there to protect vulnerable children from exploitation, but this inverts that protection by using under aged girls in sexualised images, as bait for predatory men,” Baird said.“It is deliberately coming as close as possible to breaking the law to show it is naughty but nice to like children. [Sullivan is] not a man who should have any safeguarding responsibilities and hard to see how he ought ever to have had control of a newspaper.”At the time, the Sport maintained it had acted legally, by not showing the girls fully topless until they reached 16. The law changed in 2004, meaning it is now illegal to show indecent images of anyone under 18.Sullivan remains West Ham’s largest shareholder despite his resignation as co-chair and director. The new football regulator could force him to sell his 38.8% stake in the east London club.The IFR, introduced under last year’s Football Governance Act, is the game’s independent watchdog and oversees its own owners, directors and senior executives (ODSE) regime for clubs across the Premier League and English Football League. It has the power to expel any figures it considers unsuitable.An IFR spokesperson said: “These are extremely serious allegations. We are in contact with West Ham on this matter and will use our statutory powers to seek urgent information from David Sullivan relating to his suitability under our owners, directors and senior executives regime. We are unable to comment further at this stage.”The former Home Office minister Alex Davies-Jones questioned whether Sullivan should have been allowed to play a powerful role in football given his previous business practices.He has been a prominent figure in the English game for more than 30 years. Before his involvement with West Ham, he co-owned Birmingham City.Davies-Jones said she acknowledged that Sullivan had not broken the law via his ownership of the Sport but had failed to show any insight into the wider societal impact of some of its content.Some models who appeared in the newspapers at 16 said their glamour modelling careers affected their education, or had a detrimental effect on their mental health.Davies-Jones said: “Times change and public cultures and attitudes move on but he himself has not seemed to have any contrition for his behaviour.“That speaks to more of his character. He hasn’t acknowledged how deeply troubling that behaviour, that culture [was to] us all as a society.“There is no atonement, no contrition, no recognition of [how] that business model fuels a culture of violence against women and girls.”Lawyers for Sullivan did not respond to a request for comment.

Emine Sinmaz, Geraldine McKelvie and Jacob SteinbergTue, 09 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Football regulator could force David Sullivan to sell West Ham stake

Football News

Football regulator could force David Sullivan to sell West Ham stake

Former pornographer, who owns 38.8% of club, has been accused of sexually exploitative and predatory behaviourThe football regulator could force David Sullivan to sell his stake in West Ham United after the former pornography billionaire was accused of sexually exploitative and predatory behaviour against women over several decades.The 77-year-old announced his resignation as a director and co-chair of the football club on Saturday, ahead of a joint investigation by the BBC and the Times reporting on seven women accusing him of sexual misconduct.Three women alleged Sullivan abused his power as the owner of the Sport newspapers to prey on them for sex when they were seeking work. A further four women accused Sullivan of exploitative and predatory behaviour, including allegations he tried to pressure them into sex during business meetings.The BBC and Times said their reporters had spoken to dozens of former models and industry insiders, with some sources alleging Sullivan was known for “casting couch” behaviour.Sullivan has denied the allegations, which the BBC and Times said spanned decades, starting in the 1980s and involving women in their late teens and early 20s. Through his lawyers, Sullivan said: “I categorically deny all of these complaints.”He added: “After a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry, in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me.” He did not respond to follow-up queries from the Guardian.Sullivan, who remains the largest shareholder at West Ham with 38.8%, has been a prominent figure in English football for more than 30 years. English football’s new Independent Football Regulator said the allegations were “extremely serious” and confirmed it was seeking further information from Sullivan.The IFR, introduced under last year’s Football Governance Act, is the game’s independent watchdog and oversees its own owners, directors and senior executives (ODSE) regime for clubs across the Premier League and English Football League. It has the power to expel any figures it considers unsuitable. “Honesty and integrity” assessments of owners are part of its remit.An IFR spokesperson said: “These are extremely serious allegations. We are in contact with West Ham on this matter and will use our statutory powers to seek urgent information from David Sullivan relating to his suitability under our owners, directors and senior executives regime. We are unable to comment further at this stage.”Sullivan bought a 50% stake in West Ham with his business partner, the late David Gold, in January 2010. It remains to be seen whether he tries to hold on to his stake, although a source close to Sullivan has indicated he is open to selling up. His sons, Jack and Dave Jr, remain directors at West Ham. Sullivan did not address questions from the Guardian about whether he would sell his stake or try to pass it on to his sons.It is unclear if Daniel Křetínský, a Czech billionaire who owns a 27% stake in the club, will look to increase his shareholding. Plans for Křetínský and Sullivan both to buy a portion of the Gold family’s 25.1% shares in West Ham and become equal partners in the boardroom were put on ice after the club’s relegation from the Premier League last month.West Ham are in financial trouble after dropping into the Championship and posting a loss of £104.2m last year. Several executives have left the club in recent months, most notably Karren Brady, who stepped down as vice-chair in April.

Jacob SteinbergTue, 09 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Revealed: David Sullivan’s Sunday Sport sold sexualised images of 15-year-old girls

Football News

Revealed: David Sullivan’s Sunday Sport sold sexualised images of 15-year-old girls

Sunday Sport’s ‘Countdown to 16’ used revealing photoshoots with young girls to trail topless pictures published after their 16th birthdaysIn 1987, the tabloid press in Britain was at the peak of its powers. The Sun newspaper, with its brash celebrity scoops and strident support for Margaret Thatcher – who won her third general election that year – was selling almost 4m copies a day.Competition for stories and readers was relentless, resulting in ever more salacious and lurid editorial devices to win a slice of the readership from rivals on the newsstand. The Sun stood atop the tabloid market, its topless Page 3- girls credited with a share of its popularity. It was against this backdrop that the Sunday Sport, a red-top publication occupying the seediest corner of Fleet Street, launched a feature that even by its own standards appeared to plumb the depths of journalistic ethics.On 6 September 1987, the newspaper began counting down to the 16th birthday of schoolgirl Natalie Banus – when she could legally be pictured topless.Owned by the pornography baron David Sullivan, who announced his resignation as a joint-chair and director of West Ham this weekend, the Sunday Sport had launched in the previous year in a blaze of controversy.Its coverage of Banus coincided with a short-lived and ill-fated merger with its ailing rival, the Daily Star – the Sunday Sport was briefly rebranded as the Star Sunday Sport – and together they devoted countless column inches to the teenager they described as “the sexiest 15-year-old in Britain”, measuring “a fantastic 40-22-34”.When Banus, from Hendon, north London, first appeared in the Sunday Sport, the newspaper pushed the law to its limits by picturing her semi-naked, her chest obscured only by her arms. The law at the time forbid the publication of indecent images of under 16s. The Sunday Sport insisted it was compliant with the rules as Banus was “not quite topless”.It described 15 as being “the age of the nymphet” and proclaimed Banus “the sexiest Lolita of them all”. Fully topless pictures of Banus, from Hendon, north London, were duly published in the Daily Star when she turned 16 a month later. The Sunday Sport also encouraged its readers to call a premium-rate chat line to have a chance of hearing her voice.Almost 40 years on from her tabloid debut, Banus reflected on her glamour modelling career in a memoir, Dark Star, published earlier this year. “The Sunday Sport wished me a good [birthday] and told readers that I was legal, meaning that I could both show my boobs and that anyone who had sex with me no longer had to fear they might be arrested,” she said.Banus, who had hoped to be a ballet dancer before being scouted by a glamour photographer, said she wept when she read the pieces published in anticipation of her birthday. One Daily Star piece included an account of an alleged incident in a changing room where she said she feared a teenage boy would sexually assault her. After she turned 16 on 11 October, she recalled that the Daily Star ran topless pictures of her “all week … always paired with some nonsense story about me being so proud of my tits, getting groped or fantasising about sex”.This led to more work with Sullivan’s magazines and newspapers, with some of her explicit shoots taking place in his former home in Essex, she said. In her memoir, Banus said that Sullivan told her she was “a cut above so many models” and “dynamite” when it came to selling papers.Sullivan’s career in the adult entertainment industry has been thrown into sharp focus this weekend, after he announced he was standing down as a director and co-chair of West Ham to apply his “full energy and attention” to fighting what he described as “false allegations” concerning his personal conduct. The claims have apparently been gathered as part of a joint investigation by BBC Panorama and the Times and are due to be published on Monday.Sullivan did not elaborate on the accusations he is facing, but said: “After a lifetime spent building businesses in the adult industry, in which I have met thousands of women, it is sadly inevitable that a small number of improper conduct claims are being made against me.” He did not respond to follow up queries from the Guardian.Despite her condemnation of the newspapers she featured in, Banus has always stopped short of criticising Sullivan personally and has never made any allegations about his behaviour towards her. In her book, she said: “While opinions on him may vary, I say with honesty that he has shown me courtesy and kindness in our dealings.” After the news of Sullivan’s departure from West Ham broke, Banus reiterated that he had “always treated [her] with respect and courtesy.”While the relationship between the Star and the Sport lasted just eight weeks – it was reported that advertisers and journalists began to vote with their feet, largely in protest at the seedy influence of Sullivan – he was undeterred. The Sunday Sport and its sister paper, the Daily Sport, continued for more than 15 years to celebrate the 16th birthdays of teenage girls by picturing them topless.The images were often published alongside the newspapers’ famously outlandish stories. (They claimed a London bus had been found at the south pole, and that aliens had turned a man into a fish finger.) Some teenage models became staples of their pages for years to come, but others retreated from the limelight, bruised by the sudden exposure to the sleaziest end of Britain’s newspaper market. Some young women were encouraged to share details of their supposed sexual experiences, which several later alleged were exaggerated or simply made up.On 3 July 1994, the Sunday Sport pictured a bikini-clad Linsey Dawn McKenzie, from Wallington, south London, beneath the headline: “Please print my boobs when I’m 16.” It told its readers that “stunning schoolgirl” McKenzie, who went on to be one of the country’s most high-profile glamour models, was 15 years, 10 months, three weeks and four days old – meaning there were just under six weeks to go until her milestone birthday. It said that for “legal reasons” it wouldn’t show her fully topless until she was 16.McKenzie, who recently retired from glamour modelling after more than three decades, featured in the newspaper every week until she turned 16. As the weeks ticked past, it encouraged its readers to draw pictures of how they imagined McKenzie would look topless and printed its favourites. It dished out coupons so its clientele could pre-order copies of its 14 August edition, where it was promised McKenzie would reveal all.“Here she is at last, folks,” the newspaper said, when the day finally arrived. “Lovely Linsey Dawn McKenzie – sweet sixteen and stripped bare for YOU.”On 17 May 1998, it was Zoe Parker’s turn. Parker, who had been scouted just weeks earlier when her stepfather, Bob, took her to a pornography fair, appeared topless in the Sunday Sport next to the headline: “I’m sweet 16 and I can’t get enough.” The accompanying article was replete with details about her supposedly outrageous sex life. The ensuing furore saw Parker, living in Stamford, Lincolnshire, expelled from school.The next year, Parker told the Sunday People that she had been coerced into glamour modelling by Bob and that it had driven her to the brink of suicide. “I was lonely, frightened and couldn’t carry on,” she said. “I couldn’t take any more and I thought the only way was to kill myself.”Parker later claimed that some of the things she had said in the media about her sexual experiences were “rubbish” but alleged she was encouraged to invent stories by her stepfather who thought it “great publicity”. For his part, Bob said he had “only tried to encourage my daughter to do what she wanted to do”.The Sport newspapers also profited from adverts for videos involving 16-year-old girls well into the 00s. In 2002, they ran a series of promotions for “incredibly hardcore” pornographic videos involving “barely legal” teenagers, some of whom they claimed were in school uniforms or had been filmed having sex for the first time.One of the last 16-year-old models to grace its pages was Cherry Frampton, from Buckley, north Wales, who appeared under the name Cherry Dee. Scouted at 15, she first appeared topless in the Sunday Sport on 10 August 2003, next to the headline: “Happy 16th bare-day”. An advert in the Daily Sport the previous day, showing Frampton in lingerie and suspenders, said: “She’s sweet 16 and just left school, her boobs are 32E and still growing. Tomorrow, only in the Sunday Sport, she’s getting them out!”At 20 years old, six months after being crowned Miss Sunday Sport 2007, Frampton gave up glamour modelling to train as a nurse. Speaking about the glamour industry more generally, she later told the Wales on Sunday newspaper that she was concerned about some models openly doing cocaine on shoots, adding that, for some of her peers it was a gateway to sex work. “Loads of them worked as strippers, in lapdancing clubs and as escorts, some of them even selling sex,” Frampton said. “I know a lot of them were tempted into porn but I wasn’t hungry for all that.”A change in the law in 2004 – making it illegal to publish indecent images of under-18s – sounded the death knell for Sullivan’s countdown to 16. However, for several years, the internet has been awash with rumours about how he treated both the young models who were handpicked to adorn the Sport’s pages and other women and girls he came into contact with.Sullivan is a man who has been making money from the sex industry for decades. Born in Cardiff in 1949, he moved to Hornchurch, Essex, at the age of 11. After graduating with a degree in economics from Queen Mary College, University of London, he began selling explicit photos via a small mail-order business he established in the east end of London in the early 1970s. A string of sex shops and pornographic magazines followed.“I was incredibly lucky, because I was getting raided by Scotland Yard weekly, but we became very chummy with them,” Sullivan recalled in a Channel 4 documentary, broadcast in 2024. “The head of the obscene publications squad came to see me one day and said: ‘I’m going to help you. Now, as long as you avoid bondage, you won’t face prosecution.’ That allowed me to do things other magazines weren’t doing. We charged on, and destroyed the market.”By 25, Sullivan was a millionaire, and decided to branch into films. The first, and most successful, was 1977’s Come Play With Me, starring Sullivan’s then girlfriend, Mary Millington. She took her own life in 1979, after a series of raids on a sex shop she operated in south London, saying she felt “beaten” by the police. She left a suicide note for Sullivan, asking him to push for more pornography to be legalised. Sullivan continued to distribute pornographic footage of her after her death, apparently in tribute to her.Sullivan described Come Play With Me as “a Carry On film with tits and bums and pubic hair”.“I had made a pile of money and I thought, I fancy making a movie for a bit of fun,” he told Channel 4. “Within a week, we were filming.”Come Play With Me was marketed as the “strongest sex comedy film ever produced and distributed in Britain”. The press reported at the time that some actors went on strike because the final cut was far more explicit than they had anticipated.As Sullivan’s notoriety grew, so did his apparent demands on the young women he encountered. Several have since spoken publicly about how he would expect sexual favours in exchange for work. Vicki Scott, a former glamour model and Marilyn Monroe lookalike, recalled her first encounter with Sullivan in the late 1970s, in an interview with the Sunday People.“I’ll never forget when I was about 19 and I went to see him for the first time about a magazine job,” Scott said, speaking in 1987. “After telling me to strip off, he tried it on and I would not have it. He said: ‘That’s how it is if you want to work with me.’” Scott, then 29, told the newspaper that she had tried to warn other aspiring models about Sullivan. “I’d tell the girls: ‘Look, you can see Dave, but you’ll probably have to sleep with him,’” she said.At the time, Sullivan did not address Scott’s comments directly but said he was declaring “war” on the Sunday People, and reportedly told its journalists:” “If your editor wants to delve into my private life, I will delve into his.”In 1981, the News of the World was contacted by Sue Stewart, a 24-year-old secretary who said she had answered an advertisement for a £150-a-night job carrying out “promotional entertainment work”. In an interview with the newspaper, Stewart said Sullivan had asked her to undress, then tried to have sex with her. When she refused, he reportedly said: “If you aren’t going to do anything, it’s like a boxer without any training. I don’t know what you can do.”The News of the World then asked an undercover reporter, Tina Dalgleish, to respond to a similar advert. When she arrived at Sullivan’s then home in Chigwell, Essex, she said he wanted to know whether she was “interested in doing anything sexually” for money.According to Dalgleish, Sullivan said: “We’re not going to persuade you to do anything you don’t want to do. But do you want to get up to no good or not? I mean, my time is valuable.” She said he invited her to his bedroom, where he suggested they have sex so he could “judge her performance”. Dalgleish wrote that she made her excuses and left. Sullivan does not appear to have commented on the story at the time.The next year, Sullivan was convicted of living off the immoral earnings of prostitutes after two London saunas he operated were raided by police. Mark Killick, a journalist who wrote a book about Sullivan published in 1994, said the women working there were “poorly paid and exploited”. Sullivan was ordered to serve nine months in prison, but was freed after 71 days when he successfully appealed against the length of his sentence.After his release, Sullivan tried to distance himself from the more extreme fringes of the sex industry. He set his sights on two longstanding ambitions: owning a newspaper and a football club.The Sunday Sport was launched in 1986, followed by the Daily Sport in 1991. As most businesses would not advertise in the newspapers, their pages were filled with promotions for premium sex chat lines, reportedly controlled by Sullivan and staffed by some of the models who featured in the newspapers.Sullivan sold his stake in the Sport newspapers in 2007 in a deal that earned him about £40m, but bought back some shares in 2011 in an apparent effort to save them after the company entered administration.His big move into football came when took over Birmingham City in 1993 with his business partner David Gold, whose family founded the Ann Summers empire. To the astonishment of the footballing world, he appointed 23-year-old Karren Brady, an unknown Sport advertising executive, as its managing director, launching a career that would culminate in a peerage and a starring role alongside Alan Sugar in the long-running BBC series The Apprentice. She severed her decades-long business relationship with Sullivan in April, resigning as vice-chair of West Ham United.This is not the first time there have been questions surrounding Sullivan’s behaviour. In July 2008, he was arrested on suspicion of sexually assaulting a 25-year-old actor who had visited his mansion in Theydon Bois, Essex. He denied the woman’s claims and, after an investigation lasting almost three months, the police decided to take no further action in light of advice from the Crown Prosecution Service.In a later interview with the Birmingham Mail, Sullivan claimed the encounter was consensual. “Anybody can make an allegation against anybody in this country and the police have to investigate,” he said. “I’m a rich person, so I’m a target for this sort of thing. That is the world we live in.”Sullivan and Gold sold Birmingham City shortly afterwards, buying West Ham United in early 2010. Sullivan’s former long-term partner, the one-time pornography actor and Sport glamour model Emma Benton-Hughes, with whom he has two adult sons, briefly served on the club’s board. Under his ownership, the club won its first trophy in 43 years, clinching the Uefa Conference League title with a 2-1 win over Fiorentina in 2023.However, in recent years, fans have become increasingly dissatisfied with his stewardship of the club. Their anger reached boiling point last month when the team was relegated from the Premier League. The crowd was vocal in its condemnation when Sullivan attended last month’s game against Leeds United with his reality television star fiancee, Ampika Pickston. He plans to marry Pickston, who features in the ITV series The Real Housewives of Cheshire and is 32 years his junior, next year.Over the coming days, the past exploits of a man who has made his vast personal wealth from the sexualised images of young women and girls, and pushing the law to its limits in order to publish the most extreme content possible, will likely face intense scrutiny.His history has not precluded him from reaching the pinnacle of British sport, a position from which, for many years, he exercised control over not just a prominent football club, but its women’s team and academy system for children. Despite his resignation, he retains significant financial influence over the club as its largest shareholder. Whether that position will remain tenable as full details of the allegations he faces emerge remains to be seen.

Geraldine McKelvie, Emine Sinmaz, Jacob Steinberg and Kate MeadMon, 08 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story