AccaMate logo

Football News

Latest Sports Stories

The World Cup line-up is complete - here's what you need to know

World Cup News

The World Cup line-up is complete - here's what you need to know

The 2026 World Cup is almost upon us - with a record 48 teams taking part.DR Congo and Iraq were the last two teams to book their places in the 23rd edition of the World Cup to be held in the United States, Canada and Mexico from 11 June to 19 July.It rounded off a marathon qualification process that began in September 2023 and spanned six confederations before culminating in the high‑stakes Uefa and intercontinental play‑offs.Of the 48 teams participating, the three hosts qualified automatically while 43 places were earned via direct qualification from the confederations and two spots were determined by intercontinental play-offs.With the full cast confirmed, attention now shifts towards the biggest World Cup staged.A record 48 nations - up from the 32 that featured in Qatar four years ago - will take part in the 2026 edition, making it the largest World Cup field, with 104 matches to be played across three countries for the first time.It will take place in 16 cities - 11 in the US, three in Mexico and two in Canada - between 11 June and 19 July.The tournament will also last a record 39 days - an increase from 29 days in Qatar and 32 in 2014 and 2018 - and a new format features 12 groups of four.Mexico will face South Africa in Mexico City's Estadio Azteca to open the tournament on Thursday, 11 June - 18 days after the conclusion of the Premier League season.The top two teams from the 12 groups and the eight best third‑placed nations will advance into an expanded knockout phase that will begin with a round of 32.The new world champion will be crowned at New Jersey's MetLife Stadium on 19 July.BBC Sport experts choose England World Cup XIs - who would you pick?That means for viewers in Europe, some games will be played from midnight onwards.For example, all five of the group-stage matches in Kansas City will take place in the middle of the night UK time, with the earliest kick-off being 00:00 BST on Friday, 26 June for Tunisia against the Netherlands while the latest is a 03:00 BST start for Algeria versus Austria on Sunday, 28 June.The San Francisco Bay Area hosts two games that will kick off at 05:00 BST - Austria versus Jordan on Tuesday, 16 June and Turkey versus Paraguay on Friday, 19 June.There are also 05:00 BST games in Vancouver - Australia versus Turkey on Saturday, 13 June - and in Guadalupe, Mexico, when Tunisia take on Japan on Saturday, 20 June.In total there will be 35 group-stage games that kick-off between 00:00 BST and 05:00 BST, which is almost half of the 72 fixtures for that stage.However, the most common kick-off time is 20:00 BST, with 12 group-stage games taking place then.Iran, the US, and a World Cup that starts in three monthsWed, 17 June v Croatia - Dallas at 21:00 (15:00 local)Tue, 23 June v Ghana - Boston at 21:00 (16:00 local)Sat, 27 June v Panama - New Jersey at 22:00 (17:00 local)Sun, 14 June v Haiti - Boston at 02:00 (21:00 local)Fri, 19 June v Morocco - Boston at 23:00 (18:00 local)Wed, 24 June v Brazil - Miami at 23:00 (18:00 local)European champions Spain are the favourites, having enjoyed an almost flawless route through qualification.Their squad is packed with talent such as Pedri, Fabian Ruiz, Martin Zubimendi, 2024 Ballon d'Or winner Rodri and Lamine Yamal, who is one of the best young players in the world.Just behind Spain, this generation of England players is tipped to land some silverware, having finished runners-up at the past two Euros.Thomas Tuchel's team qualified for the World Cup with a perfect record, winning all of their matches without conceding a goal. They have a squad brimming with big names including Jude Bellingham and Harry Kane.France are also strong contenders. Didier Deschamps' squad have a fearsome front line, including Bradley Barcola, Michael Olise, Kylian Mbappe and Hugo Ekitike, and the 2022 runners-up were unbeaten in European qualifying.Defending World Cup champions Argentina won the South American qualifying group by a big margin, finishing nine points ahead of second-placed Ecuador.With two Copa Americas and one World Cup win in just four years, the Albiceleste are looking strong.Finally, despite an underwhelming qualification campaign - in which they finished fifth in the Conmebol table after losing six of their 18 matches - and winning the last of their record five World Cups 22 years ago, who would confidently rule out Brazil?What information do we collect from this quiz?Who are the outside contenders?ByMichael EmonsBBC Sport journalistNorway have not played in the World Cup since 1998 and have never got past the last 16, but with Manchester City's Erling Haaland scoring 16 goals in qualifying, they could be a surprise in the summer.They were flawless in qualifying, winning all eight of their matches, including home and away victories over four-time winners Italy.Morocco were another side to win all of their qualifying games and they sit eighth in the world rankings. They reached the final of this year's Africa Cup of Nations and, despite being beaten 1-0 by Senegal, they have been controversially awarded the title. They will likely be confident of advancing from a group that contains Brazil, Scotland and Haiti.Egypt, featuring Mohamed Salah, will also expect to make it beyond a group that includes Belgium, New Zealand and Iran.Japan are the strongest of the Asian sides and cruised through qualifying, conceding only three goals in 16 matches. And they recorded their first victory over England with a 1-0 friendly win at Wembley at the end of March. They will be up against the Netherlands, Tunisia and Sweden.Colombia will be confident of a strongshowing after a good South American qualifying campaign in which they beat both Brazil and Argentina as they finished third overall.What about the host nations? Well, Canada, in their third finals, could be a surprise. They have lost all six of their previous World Cup finals matches, but a kind draw has them in with Qatar, Switzerland and Bosnia-Herzegovina.Four nations are set to make their World Cup debut this summer.The tiny Caribbean island of Curacao will become the smallest nation to participate in a World Cup when they take on Germany, Ivory Coast and Ecuador in Group E.Curacao, 37 miles off the Venezuela coast, has a population of a little more than 150,000 (similar to Cambridge or Huddersfield) and a land area of 171 square miles, smaller than the Isle of Man.They only became a country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 2010.Cape Verde, meanwhile, are the third-smallest nation after Curacao and Iceland to reach the World Cup. The Blue Sharks secured top spot in their qualifying group ahead of African heavyweights Cameroon.An archipelago of 10 islands in the Atlantic Ocean with a population of fewer than 525,000, Cape Verde gained independence from Portugal in 1975 and first attempted to reach the World Cup when it was held in Japan and South Korea in 2002. They face Spain, Saudi Arabia and Uruguay in Group HThere are two debutants from Asia in Uzbekistan and Jordan.The Uzbeks, who were the Asian Cup semi-finalists in 2011, ended their long wait for qualification under 2006 World Cup-winning Italy captain Fabio Cannavaro.The White Wolves boast players such as Manchester City defender Abdukodir Khusanov and former Roma striker Eldor Shomurodov and will hope to make an impact in a group featuring Portugal, Colombia and DR Congo.Jordan, meanwhile, finished behind South Korea with four wins and four draws from 10 matches in the third round of the qualifiers in Asia.Ranked 64th in the world, their progress has been steady, reaching the final of the 2023 Asian Cup, when they were beaten by hosts Qatar. Argentina, Algeria and Austria await in Group J.Listen to the latest Football Daily podcastSoundsGet football news sent straight to your phone

BBC Sport WCWed, 01 Apr 2026
Source: BBC Sport WC
Read story
Lewandowski misses out on World Cup - who else won't be there?

World Cup News

Lewandowski misses out on World Cup - who else won't be there?

305 CommentsOne of the greatest strikers of the past 15 years - Poland's Robert Lewandowski - is among the big names who will not be playing at the 2026 World Cup in Canada, the United States and Mexico.The 37-year-old Barcelona striker, who has scored 89 goals for his country, was not able to inspire his side as they lost 3-2 in Stockholm against Sweden in Tuesday's play-off final.Lewandowski, who won the German Bundesliga title on 10 occasions - twice with Borussia Dortmund and then in eight successive seasons with Bayern Munich, before winning La Liga twice with Barca - may have played in his last major international tournament.We have taken a look at six players who have missed out on qualifying for this summer's finals.Gianluigi Donnarumma has been one of the best goalkeepers in the Premier League this season since he moved from Paris St-Germain for £26m in September, after helping the French club win the Champions League last season.Despite being player of the tournament as Italy won the 2020 European Championship, he misses out on a World Cup again after Italy lost 4-1 on penalties to Bosnia-Herzegovina on Tuesday.Italy fail to qualify for third World Cup in a row after Bosnia shootout defeatTurkey beat Kosovo to reach first World Cup in 24 yearsWho is a certain starter at the World Cup? How England's players ratedBut he will not be at the World Cup as his country Guinea went out in the first round of African qualifying, finishing fourth in their group, with only four wins and three draws from their 10 matches.Khvicha Kvaratskhelia helped Paris St-Germain become European champions last season, scoring in the 5-0 final win over Inter Milan, and he came 12th in the 2025 Ballon d'Or awards.But Georgia had a miserable campaign in World Cup qualifying as they only picked up three points from a group that contained Spain, Turkey and Bulgaria.Lewandowski captained Poland at the World Cup in 2018, but did not score in Russia as his country came bottom of the group. He had a better tournament four years later in Qatar, scoring twice as Poland reached the last 16 before losing to France.He netted four times in Group G in 2026 qualifying only for Poland to finish three points behind the Netherlands, before losing to Sweden on Tuesday.Victor Osimhen helped Napoli win Serie A in 2023 before moving to Galatasaray, where he grabbed 26 goals in 30 games to take them to the Turkish title last season.Nigeria drew five of their 10 matches in the first group phase as they finished one point behind winners South Africa, but then had a second chance in the following play-off.With Osimhen already substituted, Nigeria lost on penalties to DR Congo to miss out on the World Cup.Liverpool and Hungary midfielder Dominik Szoboszlai has impressed this season and scored some stunning long-range goals.But he will not be at the World Cup after his country let a 2-1 lead slip in their final group game with the Republic of Ireland scoring twice in injury time to clinch a spot in the play-offs and eliminate Hungary.The World Cup in June and July will be a festival of football, but other players not there include goalkeeper Jan Oblak (Atletico Madrid and Slovenia), left-back Milos Kerkez (Liverpool and Hungary), centre-half Nikola Milenkovic (Nottingham Forest and Serbia), defender Willi Orban (RB Leipzig and Hungary), defender Riccardo Calafiori (Arsenal and Italy), full-back Ola Aina (Nottingham Forest and Nigeria), right-back Matty Cash (Aston Villa and Poland), midfielder Sandro Tonali (Newcastle and Italy) and winger Bryan Mbeumo (Manchester United and Cameroon).Listen to the latest Football Daily podcast

BBC Sport WCTue, 31 Mar 2026
Source: BBC Sport WC
Read story
How Scotland found their base camp for 'travelling' World Cup

World Cup News

How Scotland found their base camp for 'travelling' World Cup

An Englishman, an Irishman and a Scotsman were waiting at the door of Charlotte FC's training ground for Steve Clarke's arrival.On his search for Scotland's World Cup base camp, the head coach found the one in North Carolina, with a wee hand from a few familiar faces.MLS side Charlotte are coached by Dean Smith, the former Aston Villa manager and pal of Clarke, his assistant is the Scotland boss' former Kilmarnock player, Gary Dicker and the club's technical director is Clarke's ex-St Mirren team-mate, Tommy Wilson.They say it's not what you know, but who you know.A few other nations checked out the Atrium Health Performance Park, while the Scots searched "most of the East Coast", but Charlotte will be their home from home when they compete in their first World Cup since 1998 - against Haiti and Morocco in Boston and Brazil in Miami.With both cities around a two-hour flight away, Clarke said he is hopeful the "top" facilities will provide his side with the "best possible conditions" as they make their long-awaited return to the biggest stage of them all.With the help of Charlotte assistant Dicker and Scotland assistant Steven Naismith, BBC Scotland gets the lowdown on "one of the best facilities in the MLS" and the national team's summer set-up.Scotland choose Charlotte as base for World CupFor Scotland, Naismith admitted getting it right for "travel and humidity" was paramount."It's a travelling World Cup," the assistant coach and Sportscene pundit said."We've got two games in Boston, one in Miami, but there's only a limited amount of facilities around Boston."That was probably the biggest challenge. We've done a lot of work seeing a lot of training bases - there's a lot on offer - but we're delighted with Charlotte."Clarke's former Killie midfielder Dicker agreed it's "a really good central base" with flights to both Scotland's match cities only a couple of hours."I know it's difficult when at past tournaments it's easier to get around, but you do get used to it here, having an hour, two-hour flight and it not being a big deal."We're only 20 minutes from the private airport, so I'm sure they'll fly in and out of there too."The travel isn't the only thing the Scots will need to adapt to this summer. The heat and humidity is not something they're used to.Extreme heat during last summer's Club World Cup sparked conversations about this summer's tournament. Benfica's win against Bayern Munich in Charlotte was played at 15:00 local time in sweltering 36C conditions."I think the humidity ticks the boxes here as well," Dicker added."It's really hot and humid in the summer, which I think will really help them when they are going to Miami because it's going to be so, so hot down there."In Naismith's words, "world class facilities which are purpose-built for football".That might sound like the bare minimum, but as he scoured around for the ideal spot, the former international found many were tailored for NFL, basketball or baseball teams."You're actually having to compromise a wee bit on the actual facilities at some places," he explained."But in Charlotte, they've got the latest technology and recovery. The layout of these are all very much equipped for what we want, what we expect and what the players want day-to-day at their clubs."Dicker, who played and coached at Brighton, said the club's training ground was one of the most impressive aspects when he made the move across the pond in 2024."We've got four grass pitches, a full-size astro pitch and another nine-aside astro," he told the BBC."From multiple buildings, meeting rooms, the auditorium, gyms and the canteen, we've got everything pretty close but also in completely separate buildings."Real Madrid have been, Inter Milan were here for the Club World Cup, I think we've had four or five 'big' clubs come here for pre-season, so it wasn't a surprise we had a lot of national teams come and look here."But we have a decent Scottish connection and I think that helps a lot. There's a comfort there."The gaffer here obviously knows Steve well, I think they know they'll be looked after quite well. He worked with John McGinn and a few other Scotland players, so having that connection, understanding what teams need and being flexible with it, really helps."It's also not just about what the squad and staff need. Their families matter too.This is the biggest - and potentially longest - experience and tournament many will partake in. And with it being on the other side of the world, many will want their loved ones close by.But Dicker, who has his wife and children with him, insists there's plenty for families to do."You're away for so long, I'm sure most of them are going to come with their families," he explained. "But there's loads of stuff to do here with the kids."It's a fast-growing city, which isn't too busy, while you're close to the mountains and sea too."Even if they do want to go to Disneyland it's an hour-and-a-half flight to come back and down, it's not far at all."While Clarke might not want to hear of Andy Robertson running around in Mickey Mouse ears, downtime is a priority for the head coach and his staff, who will be "encouraging their freedom"."We're away for a long time, so it was important to get that relaxed element too," the assistant coach added."It was important that we were not isolated in a training facility that's not in a city, and in Charlotte, there's a lot for the players to do."We'll be encouraging them and I'm sure we'll try and get them to follow the routine they have back at home, if that's being able to see family time at certain points or if that's going out to do some shopping in an afternoon."Each player's got their own way of working and the manager's very open to allow that to be the feel around the group."

BBC Sport WCTue, 31 Mar 2026
Source: BBC Sport WC
Read story
How to watch the World Cup on the BBC and ITV

World Cup News

How to watch the World Cup on the BBC and ITV

The BBC will broadcast Scotland's first men's World Cup match since 1998, when they take on Haiti on 14 June, as well as their final group match against Brazil.England's second group match - against Ghana on 23 June - will also be shown on BBC, as well as their knockout fixtures in the last 32, last 16, and semi-final provided they reach those stages.England's other Group L matches - against Croatia and Panama - and Scotland's meeting with Morocco will be shown on ITV.The BBC will have three of the top four picks in the round of 16 and three of the top five picks in the round of 32.Defending champions Argentina will have their group meetings with Austria and Jordan shown live on the BBC.The BBC will also show two group matches apiece for 2022 finalists France, five-time champions Brazil, the Netherlands and Portugal."We can't wait to bring you the Fifa Men's World Cup," said director of BBC Sport Alex Kay-Jelski."From (hopefully) England knockout games live on BBC1 and iPlayer to Scotland's crunch matches with Haiti and Brazil to glamour games featuring Messi, Mbappe, Ronaldo, Yamal, Salah, Haaland, and more, we will bring you the drama and analysis of the moments that matter."And the ones you can't stay up for, we will have you covered the next morning too."Niall Sloane, ITV director of sport, said: "We are proud to broadcast the FIFA World Cup here at ITV and ensure it stays free-to-air for the UK audience to enjoy all summer."The 2026 World Cup will be co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, the first time the tournament will be staged by three different nations.The opening match will take place on 11 June 2026 in Mexico City, with the final on 19 July in New Jersey.England and Scotland find out World Cup kick-off times11 June: Mexico v South Africa (20:00 BST) - ITV12 June: South Korea v Czech Republic (03:00) - ITV12 June: Canada v Bosnia-Herzegovina (20:00) - BBC13 June: Qatar v Switzerland (20:00) - ITV14 June: Australia v Turkey (05:00) - ITV14 June: Netherlands v Japan (21:00) - ITV15 June: Ivory Coast v Ecuador (00:00) - BBC15 June: Spain v Cape Verde (17:00) - ITV15 June: Saudi Arabia v Uruguay (23:00) - ITV16 June: Iran v New Zealand (02:00) - BBC17 June: Argentina v Algeria (02:00) - ITV17 June: Portugal v DR Congo (18:00) - BBC18 June: Uzbekistan v Colombia (03:00) - BBC18 June: Czech Republic v South Africa (17:00) - BBC18 June: Switzerland v Bosnia-Herzegovina (20:00) - ITV19 June: Mexico v South Korea (02:00) - BBC19 June: Scotland v Morocco (23:00) - ITV20 June: Netherlands v Sweden (18:00) - BBC20 June: Germany v Ivory Coast (21:00) - ITV21 June: Spain v Saudi Arabia (17:00) - BBC21 June: Cape Verde v Uruguay (23:00) - BBC22 June: Egypt v New Zealand (02:00) - ITV22 June: Argentina v Austria (18:00) - BBC23 June: Portugal v Uzbekistan (18:00) - ITV24 June: Colombia v DR Congo (03:00) - ITV24 June: Canada v Switzerland & Bosnia-Herzegovina v Qatar (20:00) - ITV24 June: Scotland v Brazil & Morocco v Haiti (23:00) - BBC25 June: Mexico v Czech Republic & South Africa v South Korea (02:00) - BBC25 June: Germany v Ecuador & Curacao v Ivory Coast (21:00) - BBC26 June: Turkey v USA & Paraguay v Australia (03:00) - ITV26 June: Japan v Sweden & Netherlands v Tunisia (00:00) - BBC26 June: France v Norway & Senegal v Iraq (20:00) - ITV27 June: Cape Verde v Saudi Arabia & Uruguay v Spain (01:00) - ITV27 June: Egypt v Iran & New Zealand v Belgium (04:00) - BBC27 June: England v Panama & Croatia v Ghana (22:00) - ITV28 June: Algeria v Austria & Argentina v Jordan (03:00) - BBC28 June: Colombia v Portugal & DR Congo v Uzbekistan (00:30) - BBCListen to the latest Football Daily podcastSoundsGet football news sent straight to your phone

BBC Sport WCWed, 10 Dec 2025
Source: BBC Sport WC
Read story
World Cup stunning moments: Germany humiliate Brazil 7-1 | Simon Burnton

World Cup News

World Cup stunning moments: Germany humiliate Brazil 7-1 | Simon Burnton

This article is more than 8 years oldWorld Cup stunning moments: Germany humiliate Brazil 7-1This article is more than 8 years oldGermany conjured football of a savagery unwitnessed against significant opposition in the tournament’s historyWhen it comes to the World Cup, hosting is supposed to help. Just ask Uruguay (1930), Italy (1934), England (1966), West Germany (1974), Argentina (1978) and France (1998), or Sweden (1958), Chile (1962) and South Korea (2002), who unexpectedly finished second, third and fourth, respectively. Rival teams should be cowed by the passion and the number of home fans, the hosts buoyed.Not this time. “You looked at the faces of the Brazilian players when they walked on the pitch during the World Cup and it looked like they were about to compete in the Hunger Games,” said Zico, great Brazilian midfielder of the 1970s and 80s. “They weren’t enjoying the moment and that made things harder for them. The moment they met a team of the same pedigree they were caught out.”Brazil and Spain are the only World Cup winners not to have won at home, which is particularly surprising as the former have won pretty much everywhere else, and have hosted twice. On the first attempt in 1950 they unexpectedly lost to Uruguay in the final at the Maracanã, a scar on the nation’s footballing psyche that came to be known as the Maracanazo. In 2014 they created another miserable legend, the Mineirazo. This, though, was more than just an upset, different to mere disappointment. This was humiliation.For seven first-half minutes, Germany conjured football of a savagery unwitnessed against significant opposition in the tournament’s history. This was football as blood sport. Between the eighth second of the 23rd minute and the 49th second of the 29th minute Germany, one goal to the good already, scored four more, piercing Brazil’s defence with such frequency and brutality and engendering such horror among onlookers that footage really should be viewed through an opaque shower curtain and accompanied by a screeching Bernard Herrmann score. It was a nation’s dreams being sluiced down the plughole in a stream of saltwater. “I just wanted to give some happiness to my people. To my people, who suffer so much already,”David Luiz said after the game. “I just wanted to see my people smiling.”In the 23rd minute, when Miroslav Klose became the first man to score 16 World Cup goals and put Germany two up, television cameras picked out a female Brazil fan, face painted green and gold, a single tear rolling down her cheek. A minute later Toni Kroos sent a first-time, left-footed shot screaming into the net from the edge of the area, and cameras focused on another female fan, looking at her companion in utter bemusement. It was already too much for one couple of São Paulo. “I was watching at home with my wife and, after the third goal went in, she started to cry,” said Tite, current Brazil coach. “That started me off. The 7-1 is like a ghost. It’s present. People still talk about it, but the more you talk about it, the less likely it is that the ‘ghost’ disappears.”It wasn’t over. From the resulting kick-off Kroos stole the ball from Fernandinho, played a one-two with Sami Khedira and sidefooted in a third. Three minutes later, when Khedira scored the fifth, directors left the fans alone.Meanwhile, on Germany’s bench, coach Joachim Löw had a question for his assistant, Hansi Flick. “Hansi, tell me,” he asked, “is this actually happening?” Löw describes his feelings at this point as “a mix of absolute joy and disbelief. It was 5-0, in a semi-final against the hosts. It was unbelievable”.A little over 15 minutes later Löw gave a half-time team-talk surely unlike any other, one in which he felt compelled to ask his players not to be too good. “I didn’t want anyone to make a fool of the Brazilians in front of an audience of millions,” he said. “The respect the Brazilians showed to us, across the country, was enormous. And for me, it was completely unthinkable that we should humiliate them, or to show arrogance towards them.”Eight years earlier Löw had been assistant manager to Jürgen Klinsmann when the Germans were beaten on home soil in a World Cup semi, by Italy in Dortmund. “In 2006 we experienced for ourselves how painful it can be to miss out on a World Cup final in front of your own fans,” said Löw. In 2014 they mixed cruelty with sympathy.There were two more German goals in the second half, both scored by the substitute Andre Schürrle, though there could have been more: Oscar’s last-minute consolation for Brazil came seconds after Mesut Özil had been one on one with Júlio César, only to miss the chance.It was Brazil’s first World Cup semi-final defeat for 76 years, and their first defeat at home in any competitive match for 39 years. It was their most emphatic defeat of any kind for nearly a century, since Uruguay beat them 6-0 in 1920. In the history of the World Cup, the only other teams to have found themselves five goals down at half-time are Zaire (to Yugoslavia in 1974) and Haiti (to Poland in the same year); this is not the kind of company Brazil are used to keeping.Two members of the team – Luiz Gustavo and Dante – had to go back to Germany to continue club careers. “If I had been in another country, it would have been easier,” Dante said a few months later. “People quickly forget about respect. They forget everything you’ve done. You are alone. You’re playing against people who, as soon as they can, try to hurt you by reminding you of this event. It was painful and hard, but I learned a lot from it. For me, in football, what’s done is done. Today I’m happy. In life, you need to move forwards.”Neymar, Brazil’s forward and talisman, had been injured in the quarter-final against Colombia and watched the semi-final at home. Midway through the second half, with his mother Dona Nadine weeping, Neymar switched off his television. The dream of leading his team to victory – or, given his injury, simply cheering them on from the sidelines – was over.But not for long. Two years later Rio hosted the Olympics, and a younger Brazilian team with Neymar again its figurehead had a chance to make amends. They drew their first two games, against South Africa and Iraq without scoring, towhistles and jeers of a disappointed home support. Then they clicked: Denmark, Colombia and Honduras were beaten by an aggregate of 12-0 and they swept into a final against … Germany.It went, in the end, to penalties; all five Brazilians scored, Neymar the last to do so, and Nils Petersen’s effort was saved. It was a moment of catharsis and, as the players celebrated in a sold-out Maracanã, the fans struck up a particular song, one also heard when Brazil returned to the Estadio Mineirão for a World Cup qualifier three months later, for the first time since the heartache of the semi-final, and thrashed Argentina 3-0: O Campeao Voltou. The champions are back.

Simon BurntonWed, 23 May 2018
Source: The Guardian WC
Read story
World Cup stunning moments: Gazza cries as England lose at Italia 90

World Cup News

World Cup stunning moments: Gazza cries as England lose at Italia 90

This article is more than 8 years oldWorld Cup stunning moments: Gazza cries as England lose at Italia 90This article is more than 8 years oldPaul Gascoigne’s bottom lip wobbled as he was ruled out of a World Cup final England would never reach, and Gazzamania was born“I got the ball in the centre circle and bundled my way forward. Then, as Matthaus tried to nick it off me, I nudged the ball out of his reach, but overran it. I had to stretch as Thomas Berthold came across. I was giving it 110%. It was the World Cup semi-final and I didn’t want to give them anything for free. To this day I honestly don’t think I touched him, but down he went, rolling around as if in agony. I crouched down to make sure he was OK, and at that stage I wasn’t thinking I was in trouble. There was nothing in the challenge. Then everything turned to slow motion.”For all the uplifting moments in England’s march from the foyer of ignominy to the doorstep of greatness in 1990 – David Platt’s goal against Belgium, Gary Lineker’s equaliser against West Germany, Paul Gascoigne’s own phenomenal turn to leave Holland’s Ronald Koeman trailing in the group stages – we have chosen to define it by this one. The swell of unexpected hope experienced by the English coincided with the blossoming of Gascoigne’s rare and fragile talent; they rose together, they fell together – quite a bit sooner than either would have liked – and frankly everyone’s still a bit bitter about it.Gascoigne had started only one international before an effervescent performance in a friendly against Czechoslovakia in April 1990 catapulted him into the first team for good, or at least for as long as his knee was good. And like his team he kept improving. His display against Germany, at least until the 99th minute, had been superlative.“I straightened up and turned to the ref,” Gascoigne continued in his book Glorious: My World, Football and Me. “He’s gone for his pocket. Suddenly I can’t hear anything. The world just stops apart from the bloke in black. My eyes follow his hand, to the pocket, then out with the card. There it is, raised above my head. I looked at the crowd, I looked at Lineker, and I couldn’t hold it back. At that moment I just wanted to be left alone. I didn’t want to talk to anyone or see anyone. My bottom lip was like a helicopter pad. I was devasted.”“My heart sank the moment the referee took out the yellow card,” said Bobby Robson. “My heart hit my shoes. Because I realised instantly, that was the final for Paul Gascoigne, out. And that’s a tragedy – for him, me, the team, the country, the whole of football. Because he was so good, and he was superb in this particular match. The bigger the game, the better he got.“Gascoigne knew as well, the moment the card was produced. Because I saw his face change, from being aggressive, fighting for the ball, to realising he’d committed an error, and he’d been booked, and he knew now the final was not for him. Tears began to well into his eyes. And Gary Lineker was very clever, he saw it immediately and came as close as he could to me and said, watch Gazza. Watch him. He thought now his mind might just go a bit berserk, even more berserk than he had with [giving away] the free kick. And I understood it. He knew the supreme penalty he was going to have to pay for that slight indiscretion.”In all Lineker won 80 caps for England, returned from the 1986 World Cup with the Golden Boot, won the major cup competitions of England and Spain and scored 243 times for a variety of clubs including Everton, Tottenham and Barcelona. But for all the goals and the glory more than anything he is remembered for the time someone else was booked and he made a face at his manager. “Out of everything in my career, the moment people ask me about most often was when Gazza got booked in that semi-final,” he has said. “I could see his bottom lip was going. I think it says a lot about Bobby that it was him I turned to, to ask him to have a word. I didn’t know that the moment would be caught on camera.”Robson believed that the Germans had pressured the referee into showing the card. “He flew in at the boy, upended everything, and the German bench all stood up, which unfortunately I think affected the referee,” he said. “We don’t allow players to do that. We say, ‘Sit down, it’s got nothing to do with you.’ They all jumped up and it made it worse for Paul. It was only half a booking.”The referee whose decision to wave a yellow card was to prove key to England’s World Cup elimination spoke to The Guardian about the incident in 2014 – his first interview with a British newspaper.“Listen, there was no controversy,” insists José Roberto Wright. “The lad tackled an opponent from behind and nowadays he could even have been sent off. It was none of my business if Gascoigne already had a yellow card – my job was to apply the laws of the game. He tried to argue with me and apologise, but I told him in English that it was a bookable offence. Then I got on with the game.”The booking that brought Gascoigne to tears, ended his hopes of playing in a World Cup final and left him so emotionally drained that he withdrew from the decisive penalty shoot-out – Chris Waddle replaced him, fatefully – might be considered somewhat controversial in England, but was not seen in the same light elsewhere. In 1990 Wright was named the best referee in the World Cup by the International Federation of Football History and Statistics, and later that year named the best official on the planet by the World Referees’ Federation.“I didn’t see him crying or all that commotion,” says Wright of Gascoigne. “It wasn’t until later that I saw footage of the game and noticed how upset he was. Years later I read that Gascoigne’s tears were some kind of watershed moment in English football, that it helped people fall in love with the game once again.”In England hearts skipped a beat with every wobble of Gascoigne’s bottom lip. As it turns out he was not to be the last Englishman to shed a tear that night, and player and fans bonded in a display of lachrymose unity. A few months later he was named Sports Personality of the Year. “I don’t know anybody who dislikes Paul Gascoigne,” Robson wrote in his autobiography. “The affection we all felt for him added to the poignancy of his booking. As we went into the second period of extra time, I had said to Paul, ‘Look, I know you can’t play in the final but what you can do is make sure all the other lads can. Just concentrate on that.’ This was in the heat of the battle. Now, I can appreciate how crushed Paul would have felt had we beaten the Germans that night in Turin.”Time has proven that Gascoigne’s behaviour in Turin was not borne of juvenile petulance but the result of one small fissure in a fractured mind. For all their very different characters and wildly diverse levels of experience, it is nevertheless telling to contrast Gascoigne’s reaction to his booking to that of Michael Ballack, the midfield inspiration behind a poor Germany side’s run to the final in 2002.Gascoigne received his second caution of the tournament with 20 minutes of extra time to play in his semi-final and the scores level; Ballack with 20 minutes of normal time to play in his semi-final and the scores level. Both knew they no longer had a chance of appearing in the final, but while the Englishman was of limited use from that moment onwards, Ballack scored his side’s winner within four minutes and celebrated without reservation. In the crucial moments before the shoot-out in Turin, most of the England manager’s time was spent not with the five designated takers but with Gascoigne, coping with the midfielder’s emotional disintegration.“Had Gascoigne been German he would be persona non grata today,” the former Liverpool and Newcastle midfielder Dietmar Hamman wrote in his book The Didi Man. “[After the booking] he went to pieces. The game was still tied, and a job still needed to be done, yet his first thoughts were for himself. When the game went to a penalty shoot-out Gascoigne was earmarked to take [a] penalty for England. He decided that he wasn’t in the right frame of mind to take it. For Gascoigne, in that moment, it was all about him as an individual, and the way he was feeling. It was nothing to do with his duty to the team. If Gascoigne was German his behaviour would have created a national scandal, and the player would be forgotten for ever. If it were possible to erase his name from the team sheet then it would be done.”In England the only player to receive any significant criticism for his role in the defeat in Turin was Peter Shilton, the 40-year-old goalkeeper, who made several decent saves in open play but in the shoot-out decided to delay diving until each kick had been taken, and got nowhere near any of them. “You should have bloody gambled,” Pearce shouted in the dressing-room after the game.Having wept his way to a string of product endorsements and a lucrative column in The Sun, some – including the referee who booked him – would expect that with the passing of time and the accumulation of money Gascoigne’s grief might have subsided. “The tackle was bad, and if I hadn’t booked Gascoigne I would have lost control of the game,” says Wright. “But I must say I was surprised he got so upset about it. I’ve never met him again, but I’m sure now he’d agree with me about the incident.”If the interview Gascoigne gave to the Observer in 2002 is anything to go by, that seems extremely unlikely. In it Gascoigne was asked what he thought, with the benefit of hindsight, about Berthold. “He was a dickhead. He was a tall man with a mouth like a fish. I remember all the details of his face. He was a wanker and a cheat,” Gascoigne said. “When I made that tackle, I missed him and the ball. He dived, as Germans do, to get me booked. When I see that game and I see that guy dive, I wish I had the chance now to play against him and take the piss out of him on the pitch and, if I got the chance, tackle him properly – and this time really properly. Because if I’m going to get a yellow card I would rather be for a proper foul. And it would be if I played against him again.”But Berthold had retired by the time Gascoigne faced Germany for the second and final time, in the Euro 96 semi-final. Again the Englishman was booked, and again his side lost on penalties – though on this occasion he took one, and scored. He would never again play in the finals of an international competition.For Gascoigne and the rest of the England team, and indeed their nation, each passing year makes the memories of this game both more sweet and more bitter. In what is now almost half a century since their one World Cup win they have rarely produced such a convincing performance in a match of such magnitude, and that it failed to bring any reward still bridles, particularly with the knowledge that only an unconvincing Argentina team – who had four players of their own suspended for the final – stood between the winners of this game and the World Cup trophy.“The Germans scored a fluky goal and then nothing,” said Mark Wright. “The only genius Germany showed was from the penalty spot,” said Terry Butcher. “We were the better team. We battered them,” said Gascoigne. “I consider ours to have been one of England’s best performances in the last 25 years,” said Robson. “It’s the one thing I look back on and regret,” said Lineker. “It still rankles. We were within a whisker of a World Cup final. We’d have won it too. Argentina were shot.”To some, the British beatification of the beaten represents a disturbing acceptance of failure and acts as a barrier to success. And this match is hardly unique – it stands on any list of England’s finest all-time World Cup performances alongside the brilliant displays in defeat against both West Germany and Brazil in 1970, and more besides. But what, in the end, is the difference? It’s not as if the team’s display in Turin would have been any better or worse had Pearce and Waddle scored from the spot and Olaf Thon missed. If a team succeeds in entertaining and inspiring us, it hardly matters whether they return home with their chins on the floor or with medals round their necks. Though one day it might be nice if we got to witness the latter.

Simon BurntonTue, 22 May 2018
Source: The Guardian WC
Read story
World Cup stunning moments: Diego Maradona's Hand of God | Scott Murray

World Cup News

World Cup stunning moments: Diego Maradona's Hand of God | Scott Murray

This article is more than 8 years oldWorld Cup stunning moments: Diego Maradona's Hand of GodThis article is more than 8 years oldThe 1986 quarter-final between England and Argentina is famous for one of football’s most iconic moments. But there was more to this goal – and match – than a single act of larcenyHigh noon, one blistering Sunday in Mexico City, and a quarter-final shootout between two arch rivals who hadn’t met in a World Cup for 20 years and had grievance on their minds. Rattín’s Revenge! Or, in the offices of various tabloid newspapers and the heads of the slow: Falklands II. Here are 10 things that happened during a first half everyone’s long forgotten about:1) Just before kick-off, instead of focusing on the players warming up in the oppressive sun, the Mexican television director chose to zoom in on a topless man necking the final third of a plastic cup of lager while sucking hard on a cheroot, having clearly been caught in two minds over which craving to sate first. A wonderful tableau of the relaxed atmosphere in the Azteca before kick-off, both sets of supporters in good humour, the Argentina team handing each England player their own personal pennant. A lovely touch, a small gesture of friendship, and to think everyone had been banging on about bad blood caused by the Malvinas conflict.2) The referee and his two linesmen spent the minutes leading up to kick-off loitering in the spiral shadow covering the centre circle, wishing the woofers and tweeters in the stadium PA were a hundred times more powerful, large enough in fact to cast the entire pitch in shade. Still, keep cool while you can. Clever referee! Clever Ali Ben Nasser (Tunisia)! You’d need to get up a lot earlier than midday on a Sunday to catch Ali Ben Nasser (Tunisia) out!3) On 13 minutes, perhaps the best snippet of individual skill in the entire 1986 tournament up to that point. Glenn Hoddle raked a long ball down the right channel for Peter Beardsley to pursue. The pass was too heavy, and out came Nery Pumpido, breezing across to gather. But the goalkeeper made the most basic of misjudgments, mistiming his run to meet the ball and slipping as he attempted to readjust. The ball clanked off his shin and out of the area. Beardsley, who had not given up the chase, was first to the loose ball. Pumpido scampered after him in hot pursuit, but was soon written out of the story as Beardo went burlesque: a sultry, slinky, bom-chicka shake of the hips, feinting left to send Pumpido skittering off towards the byline, then a smooth and sexy swish back through 180 degrees to the right, fashioning just enough time and space for a whipcracked shot towards the unguarded goal. Unluckily for England, the effort billowed the side-netting, inches away from a strike of the most stunning solo sass. You don’t see that sort of skill every day. And certainly rarely more than once in a single match. Sorry for any challenging mental images we might have just left you with, by the way.4) The game suffered a preposterous hold-up for two minutes towards the end of the half, when Diego Maradona shaped to take a corner on the right but found his path to the ball blocked by a row of corpulent photographers beached along the byline. Concluding that moving these fine gentlemen of the press would require the implementation of the biggest engineering project in Mexico City since the first shovel broke ground at the Azteca in 1961, Maradona instead whipped out the pole so he could attack the ball from another angle. Before he could take the corner, linesman-jobsworth Berny Ulloa Morera demanded he replace the pole. So Maradona replanted the pole. But the flag had fallen off the top, and Morera demanded that went back on too. Maradona balanced the material over the top of the pole – but even that wasn’t good enough for Morera. So Maradona slowly and carefully resheathed the pole, in surprisingly good humour under the circumstances, given he was being pestered during the biggest match of his life by an official whose time might have been better spent ordering the photographers to move, rather than asking the greatest footballer in the world to perform several basic haberdashery tasks. In the end, Maradona got one of the snappers to shift out of the road, and with a grim inevitability, sent the set piece straight into Peter Shilton’s hands. What an anticlimax. How many of the 114,580 crowd had paid to see Morera rather than Maradona was never ascertained.5) Usherettes wandered through the stands carrying trays of up to 15 ready-poured lagers, dispensing them hither and yon. What service!6) It wasn’t a great 45 minutes for the BBC commentary team, Barry Davies and Jimmy Hill. Davies was always a world-class commentator, and Hill a clever and imaginative pundit until he became a parody of himself at some tricky-to-define point during the 1980s. But both men had an off-day here, spending a good proportion of the first half taking pops at the expansionist politicians of Fifa for having the nerve to appoint the referee Ali Ben Nasser (Tunisia) on the grounds that he came from Tunisia. According to Davies, Tunisia was an “emerging nation”, which would have come as something of a surprise to, say, the residents of Tunis, a city founded in the fourth century BC. It has to be admitted that Ben Nasser wouldn’t enjoy his best day at the office either, but his errors would have bugger all to do with his being Tunisian. (It should also be pointed out that the BBC never once questioned the appointment of a linesman from notorious footballing hotbed Azerbaijan during the 1966 World Cup, and look what happened there. But we digress.)7) Mind you, Davies and Hill can be partially excused for much of their first-half jabbering, as the opening 45 minutes weren’t up to much. Argentina had most of the ball but did very little with it, though Maradona looked dangerous when probing down the channels.8) That hypnotic, hip-shaking cameo from Peter von Teese apart, England were worse than poor. There wasn’t much to write home about. Terry Fenwick blootered one shot 40 yards into the blue. On 44 minutes, England’s star man, Gary Lineker, touched the ball, toe-poking it out of play down the right. At one point, Steve Hodge, looking to hoof clear, sliced a high ball backwards into his own area. He’d have to stop that!9) Fenwick in particular made a complete show of himself. He took Maradona out on nine minutes, earning a yellow card; was later sent scrabbling around on all fours as the same player zipped past him, making off with the ball and his dignity; and just before the break, crumped his left elbow in the little man’s coupon, a vicious off-the-ball assault that deserved a straight red. It should have been an end to his afternoon. But it wasn’t.10) At half-time, news filtered through that Tele Santana, arch idealist, had resigned as coach of Brazil, who had lost a classic quarter-final to France 24 hours earlier. A symbolic moment, the last men fighting the good fight for the old-fashioned beautiful game, crushed by the wheels of modernity. Whither improvisational brilliance in international football now? We’ll never see the like again, surely.Nil-nil at half-time, then, though the second half would deliver big style, thanks mainly to one man’s absurd transgression of the laws of association football. Yep, we’re talking about Fenwick again. Five minutes after the restart, Fenwick clumped Maradona on the head as the pair went up for a challenge in the centre circle. He again whacked the Argentinian’s noggin on 66 minutes. And with five minutes to go, he upended the marauding Jorge Valdano with an absurd last-man slide tackle. Just in case you’ve lost count, and goodness knows we couldn’t blame you, Fenwick could easily, on another day, have been sent off four times.Whether Maradona was that fussed about all this dubious attention is a moot point. For a start, if you accept that deliberate and systematic fouling of talent represents the mother of all unintended compliments – the ultimate, often quite literal, stamp of approval – then this gives Maradona No1 status among those in the pantheon. Consider the questionable treatment meted out to the other greats in World Cups: Pelé was shoed around Goodison Park in 1966; Johan Cruyff was the put-upon postman to Berti Vogts’ pitbull-with-elastic-band-round-its-front-tail in the 1974 final; Ferenc Puskas was maimed by West Germany’s Werner Liebrich’s forensic strike in the 1954 groups. But Maradona has been famously worked over on the biggest stage of all not once but twice: first by Claudio Gentile in the 1982 second round, a calculating masterclass in crafty tugs, conniving pulls, cunning yanks and corrupt kicks, and then in this game four years later by the rather more remedial stylings of our man Fenwick.Second – and with far more relevance to this particular battle – it put Maradona in the frame of mind to attempt a little rule-bending of his own. (And remember it’s only over here where folk desperately try to convince themselves that a cheeky handball is somehow much more morally repugnant than a few hard belts in the mouth, upside the head, or below the belt.) Sadly for England, their Diego proved to be much more adept at the old black magic than our Tel, and the wee magician’s sauce-ery was to tilt the balance in Argentina’s favour, six minutes after the restart.So poor old Steve Hodge never did learn his lesson from the first half, and we all know what happened: the Aston Villa midfielder sliced a high, looping ball into the middle of his own area, it fell just in front of the penalty spot, and was met by Maradona, who with his left fist adroitly tickled the ball over the confused head of the sandbag-shoed Peter Shilton and into the empty net. Maradona raced off towards the right-hand corner flag to celebrate, stopping only a millisecond to take a quick peek back over his shoulder, just in case the referee was wise to the grift. Amid the carnage he left behind, Shilton could be seen waving his hands in the air in despair, while our old pal Fenwick was right up in the referee’s grille, tinkling his pinkies in an arch mime, the pair a picture of impotent frustration.Nobody came out of this affair looking good, not Maradona, not Shilton, not Hodge, not Fenwick. And certainly not referee Ali Ben Nasser (Tunisia), who had just presided over the biggest balls-up in World Cup history. But perhaps we should try to understand his mistake. It’s very difficult now to view the footage of the goal as it unfolds in an objective manner: we know exactly what Maradona’s about to do, and as such the larceny is as plain as day. Projecting our knowledge on to the canvas is almost unavoidable. But let’s give it a go. And perhaps the most instructive tool to help us is the aforementioned BBC commentary that accompanied the heist live, and remains an honest historical document of first impressions.“They’re appealing for offside but the ball came back off the boot of Steve Hodge,” said Barry Davies, unsure as to why Shilton, Fenwick and Terry Butcher were making like a Marcel Marceau tribute act, skittering after the referee while furiously slapping their own forearms. It took another 32 seconds and two television replays before the penny began to drop that something was seriously amiss. “Now at what point was he offside?” ummed-and-aahed Davies. “Or was it a use of the hand that England are complaining about?”Now, as we mentioned earlier, Davies might not have enjoyed the greatest of first halves. (As well as questioning the referee’s nationality, he also mocked an Argentinian drummer caught on camera enjoying some downtime – “He doesn’t seem to have too much to say, does he?” – as though he was somehow bringing shame on his nation by failing to metronomically riff for 45 minutes in the style of Jaki Liebezeit.) But for all his occasional bombast, Davies was a journalist of the highest order, a class act, the Maradona of the microphone. And it was in response to this incident that his quality – as well as his humility and humanity – shone through.Even after two replays, it wasn’t 100% clear that Maradona had handled, and Davies wasn’t about to make a definitive call on live television. (This might come as a shock to a generation used to media organisations announcing celebrity deaths without making a few calls first, just because someone’s popped something up on the old Twitter, but hacks really did once act like this.) It was another two minutes before Davies reported that other members of the press box, sitting nearer to England’s goal, were pretty damn sure that Maradona handled. “They have little doubt that it was a hand that put the ball past the England goalkeeper,” Davies told the nation. All of which added up to more than 120 seconds of confusion which, if nothing else, laid bare the difficulties Ali Ben Nasser (Tunisia) faced in making a snap judgment.But for all the rights and wrongs, the scoreline was the scoreline: Maradona 1-0 Fenwick. This is what happens when you try to kid a kidder.The Argentina captain had, in the final analysis, been a cheeky get. This much was true. But one thing often forgotten about that goal is his stunning play in the buildup. Maradona cut inside from the left, picking up a pass from Julio Olarticoechea and danced down the channel, past Hoddle, then Peter Reid, then Fenwick. When he reached the edge of the D, he drew Butcher and Kenny Sansom towards him before flicking a pass out right to Valdano, who attempted to turn Hodge – at which point the world came crashing in on England.That burst of skill was one thing, but Maradona was about to take it to the next level. With England still reeling, the woefully misfiring Hoddle gave the ball away cheaply in the middle of the Argentina half. It was shuttled upfield to Maradona, who faced his own goal just to the right of the centre circle. Spinning around, he dismissed Beardsley and Reid, then made off down the right, prodding the ball forward with extreme prejudice. He teased Butcher, then nipped inside as the big defender lunged. Gathering speed, he made for the penalty area, slipping past the preposterous Fenwick, then goading Shilton off his line. The keeper spread himself well, but Maradona rounded him on the right, holding off Butcher, who had bravely come back for more, and slipped the ball into the right-hand side of the exposed net. A goal so good it instantly chalked off any moral debt, and secured his place in the pantheon at exactly the same time, just as international football needed a new improvisational hero in the bleak post-Santana landscape. Speaking of redemptions, Davies, by now thoroughly recovered from his slow start, delivered one of the greatest lines in commentary history, a magnanimous and thoroughly memorable cry of “You have to say that’s magnificent! Pure football genius.” Pure commentary genius. You have to say that’s magnificent.The rest of the game was a rather strange affair. Argentina took their foot off the gas, but England failed to respond. Hoddle, who had been dreadful for the first hour, raised his game a wee bit, creating a half-chance for Beardsley from the right wing with an impudent low cross – Beardsley prodded straight at Pumpido – but it was only when John Barnes came on for Trevor Steven that England finally threatened. The Watford winger’s insouciant stride down the left set up a goal for Lineker with nine minutes to go and, after Carlos Tapia hit England’s left post straight from the restart, the pair nearly combined again with 120 seconds left on the clock. For a split second it looked like Lineker had managed to fashion a foolish miss as he tried to bundle home Barnes’s left-wing teaser, but again first impressions were deceptive: Olarticoechea rather brilliantly brushed his eyebrows on the cross with the striker lurking an inch from the line.And that was it. Argentina saw the game out, a deserved victory on both a sporting and, yes, because it wasn’t Maradona who instigated the game of silly buggers, moral level. Er, just about. England did start it, though.So Argentina had regained their national pride in the wake of the Falklands, and taken revenge on the folk who had caused their erstwhile captain, Antonio Rattín, so much pain 20 years previously at the same stage of the same competition. With that famous 1966 stramash in mind, the 1986 version tied up the narrative in a delicious symmetry. After that glorious brouhaha at Wembley, Alf Ramsey had physically – infamously – stopped George Cohen from exchanging tops with Alberto González (who simply wandered off and got a souvenir off Ray Wilson instead). This time round, Hodge, who had teed up Maradona for his grand larceny, swapped shirts with England’s tormentor-in-chief. It was, runs the old joke, the nearest Hodge got to Maradona all day. No cash prize on offer for guessing what ran through Sir Alf’s mind upon witnessing that particular transaction.Scott Murray is the co-author, along with Rob Smyth, of And Gazza Misses The Final, a history of the World Cup via the medium of the MBM

Scott MurrayThu, 12 Apr 2018
Source: The Guardian WC
Read story
World Cup stunning moments: The Battle of Santiago | Simon Burnton

World Cup News

World Cup stunning moments: The Battle of Santiago | Simon Burnton

This article is more than 8 years oldWorld Cup stunning moments: The Battle of SantiagoThis article is more than 8 years old‘This match is universally agreed by observers as the ugliest, most vicious and disgraceful in soccer history’It took two days for highlights of the match that was christened, even during the commentary, the Battle of Santiago, to be flown from South America and broadcast in Britain. Two days in which the game became, in its own brutal way, legendary, spoken of in ways which must have sent anyone with a combined interest in football and mild gore into a frenzy of excitement. “The match is universally agreed by observers as the ugliest, most vicious and disgraceful in soccer history,” wrote Frank McGhee in the Mirror. “If you think that is exaggerating, watch the film on TV. But send the kids to bed first – it deserves a horror certificate!”David Coleman’s introduction to the BBC’s broadcast is rightly legendary. “Good evening,” he said. “The game you are about to see is the most stupid, appalling, disgusting and disgraceful exhibition of football in the history of the game. This is the first time these countries have met; we hope it will be the last. The national motto of Chile reads, By Reason or By Force. Today, the Chileans weren’t prepared to be reasonable, the Italians only used force, and the result was a disaster for the World Cup. If the World Cup is going to survive in its present form something has got to be done about teams that play like this. Indeed, after seeing the film tonight, you at home may well think that teams that play in this manner ought to be expelled immediately from the competition.”But though the Battle of Santiago is remembered as a uniquely lawless encounter, in fact it was one of many in a particularly violent tournament. Before the match had even been played the Chilean newspaper Clarin had declared it less a World Cup and more a World War. “The tournament shows every sign of developing into a violent bloodbath,” wrote the Express on the morning of the match. “Reports read like battlefront despatches. Italy v Germany was described as ‘wrestling and warfare”. Players were compelled to leap away from the ball to survive. Football was forgotten as players sought to destroy each other.”The eight games played over the first two days of the tournament featured four red cards, three broken legs, a fractured ankle and some cracked ribs. The first match in England’s group, between Argentina and Bulgaria, was won by the south Americans thanks to what was described as a display of “hacking, tripping, pushing and any other dirty tricks”. After the game, in which the Spanish referee Juan Gardeazabal awarded 69 free-kicks at the rate of one every 78 seconds, the Bulgarian Todor Diev displayed a cut nose and legs decorated with stud marks and said Argentina were “like boxers”.In Russia’s opening game, against Yugoslavia, Eduard Dubinski’s leg was broken in a challenge with Muhamed Mujic. The Yugoslav was not sent off, but his association was sufficiently dismayed by the foul to voluntarily suspend him for an entire year. “It is lamentable that Fifa are not equally honest,” wrote the Express. “They have ignored their own ruling that any offenders be dealt with immediately after the offence. With no action against the few out-and-out villains the ugly situation has been encouraged to spread.”“It became clear after only two days that most teams were so anxious to avoid an early return home that they had forgotten football was only a game, and the World Cup its greatest shop window,” wrote the Telegraph’s football correspondent, Donald Saunders, in his book on the tournament published later that year. “From all four centres came reports of violence, ill temper, serious injury, and precious little of the artistic soccer to be expected of the world’s leading professionals.”Italy had behaved badly enough in their first match, but now the stakes were even higher: they would have to deal with the host nation and their fanatical support in a game they could not afford to lose. As for Chile, the Observer had declared that “the patriotism here for the national team is astonishing”, and their fervour had risen a couple of notches when word reached Santiago of a series of articles written in the Italian newspapers La Nazione and Corriere della Sera shortly before the World Cup began, which variously described the idea of their hosting it as “pure madness”, their capital as a backwater where “the phones don’t work, taxis are as rare as faithful husbands, a cable to Europe costs an arm and a leg and a letter takes five days to turn up”, and its population as prone to “malnutrition, illiteracy, alcoholism and poverty”. “Santiago is terrible,” Corrado Pizzinelli wrote in La Nazione. “Entire neighbourhoods are given over to open prostitution.” The journalists involved were forced to flee the country, while an Argentinian scribe mistaken for one of them in a Santiago bar was beaten up and hospitalised.Worried about the potential for violence at the game, and with the Italian FA having complained about the original appointment of a Spanish official for a match involving fellow hispanophones, Fifa parachuted in the experienced English referee Ken Aston. The Italians weren’t enormously impressed by that, either – Aston had already taken charge of Chile’s first game of the tournament - but they were clean out of appeals.From the start Chileans spat in the faces of Italians, they poked and kicked and provoked, but when the Italians retaliated it was they who were punished. The first foul was awarded after 12 seconds, the first sending-off after four minutes. Giorgio Ferrini, the Italian involved, refused to leave the field and play was held up for 10 minutes until armed policemen frogmarched him to the dressing-rooms. “The pitch quickly became a battlefield as players forgot the ball and concentrated on kicking the nearest opponent,” wrote the Mirror. Highlights included Leonel Sánchez, son of a professional boxer, breaking the nose of Italy’s captain Humberto Maschio with a left hook and getting away with it, and then landing another blow on the Italian right-half Mario David, who was sent off for retaliating. To add insult to, well, more insults, Sánchez took the free-kick from which Jaime Ramírez gave Chile a 73rd-minute lead, against nine men, and Jorge Toro added a late second.“I had my back to the incident at the time,” Aston insisted of Sánchez’s nosebreaking punch. “If the referee or linesman sees nothing, nothing can be done. I’m sure the linesman did see it, but he refused to tell me.” The man patrolling the nearest touchline was Leo Goldstein, who many felt had been given the chance to officiate at a World Cup only because of his unique backstory – he was a Holocaust survivor who had literally been marching towards the gas chambers when one of the guards asked if anyone was able to referee a football match. Despite a complete lack of experience he volunteered, survived the remainder of the war, emigrated to America and continued refereeing thereafter. “I was stuck with a Mexican and a little American,” said Aston of his assistants. “They weren’t very good, so it became almost me against the 22 players.”“We weren’t throwing the punches, we were taking them. We Italians were the victims, not the aggressors,” said David, many year later. “Sánchez broke Maschio’s nose and the referee said nothing, but instead sent off Ferrini who was trying to take revenge on Sánchez but didn’t even touch him. Then their goalkeeper passed the ball to Sánchez, who sat on it and held it between his legs. In order to kick the ball I had to kick him a little bit too, and when he got up he punched me, but the referee pretended nothing had happened. Then I challenged Sánchez with an outstretched leg and caught him in the shoulder, and the shameless Aston sent me off too. I stood at the entrance to the tunnel to watch the rest of the game, and I can assure you that even with nine men we fought to the end.”“The Italians could not understand – and neither can I – why Sánchez had been allowed to remain on the field despite a passable imitation of Rocky Marciano, when one of their number had been banished for a less serious and far less obvious offence,” wrote Jimmy Hill in the Observer. “From that moment the last semblance of control left both players and officials. It was an appalling decision to allow a player to remain on the field after such a blatant disregard for the laws. The players will have to shoulder most of the blame, but the officials must face up to their responsibility for making this grotesque decision.”“I expected a difficult match, but not an impossible one,” Aston said. “I just had to do the best I could. It did cross my mind to abandon the match, but I couldn’t be responsible for the safety of the Italian players if I did. I thought that then and I still think it now. I tell you one thing: I didn’t add on any stoppage time.”The hatred between the nations boiled over. In Chile, Italians found themselves banned from bars, restaurants and even supermarkets, and the squad’s training camp was placed under armed guard. Jorge Pica, a senior member of the Chilean FA, launched further controversy by alleging that the Italians were drugged. “They seemed to go on the field only with the intention of injuring the Chileans,” he said. “It was like a rodeo. Frankly, I think they were doped. Now I can see the necessity for laboratory tests on players after matches.” Meanwhile the Italians submitted an official complaint against Aston’s biased officiating, described the Chileans as “cannibals” and in Rome the army was sent in to protect the Chilean consulate.Criticism of Aston’s handling of the match was, inevitably, most extreme in Italy – “I remember that one journalist called him ‘an unmentionable English vermin,’ and I totally agree with him,” said David – but it was not confined there. The former referee and honorary president of the German FA, Peco Bauwens, said “I have never seen an English referee so weak”. “I have self-respect,” insisted the Englishman. “Otherwise I would have taken the easy way out and abandoned the game.”With the World Cup still bedevilled by violence – even while the Battle of Santiago was being played Yugoslavia were contesting “another ugly brawl” against Uruguay in Arica, featuring two sendings-off of its own – Aston and Bob Davidson, the Scottish official who had refereed Italy’s first match, went to see the Fifa president, Sir Stanley Rous. “All referees who saw this game and who have seen the general vicious malice in most matches want to tell Rous they haven’t come all these miles for all this time to handle this sort of stuff,” said Davidson.“The World Cup competition is heading for ruin and disgrace unless Sir Stanley Rous and his committee act quickly and ruthlessly to clean it up,” wrote the Mirror. “Chile today is a country of rumour and threats.” Rous heard the referees’ demand that miscreants be dealt with in the strongest possible way, and assured them that was his intention. They left happy, but then Fifa suspended Ferrini for just one match and gave David and Sánchez nothing by reprimands. Still, representatives of all 16 teams were called to the Carrera Hotel in Santiago, also the site of the draw and later of the gala celebration in honour of the victors, where Rous demanded an improvement in standards. “What will the children think when they see the abominable way the top players behave? We have to save the reputation of this tournament,” he said. “This is not about victory at all costs.”But Fifa’s crackdown was laughably half-hearted. Four years later Pelé, having been injured in Brazil’s second match in Chile, was brutally kicked out of the 1966 World Cup. “I have heard it said since, and I firmly believe it, that Sir Stanley Rous instructed referees to go easy on the ‘virile’ game played by the European teams,” he wrote in his autobiography, “with the result that [they] did everything they could to physically cripple me.”Even in Chile there was little improvement. In the semi-final between Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia the Swiss referee was forced to call the captains together with the game, according to the Express, “developing into a brawl”, and “warn them to cut out the rough stuff”. In the other semi-final, between Chile and Brazil, two men were sent off. The outstanding player of the tournament, Brazil’s Garrincha, was one of them, his head cut open by one of the many missiles thrown in his direction as he left the field. After the game he wept in the dressing-room. “OK, I was sent off,” he said, “but all afternoon I am kicked. There is a limit to the time when a man must be a man. When I was kicked I struck back. Maybe I was wrong but I am prepared to face what may come.”The Brazilian FA, however, were not. His availability for the final lay in the hands of a Fifa disciplinary committee, at which the match officials would give evidence. But first the referee, the Peruvian Arturo Yamazaki, received a phone call from his country’s president requesting that he tone down his testimony, and made Garrincha’s offence sound positively trifling. Then the linesman, Uruguay’s Esteban Marino, on whose say-so Yamazaki had acted in the first place and whose evidence was to be crucial, failed to turn up at all.“He just disappeared. It was like something out of an Agatha Christie novel,” wrote the Brazilian journalist Argeu Affonso, who was covering the tournament. “It was Agatha Christie football. He just disappeared, and nobody knew where he’d gone.” It turned out that the Brazilian World Cup referee John Etzel had been given $10,000 in cash by his FA to pass on to his colleague in return for his disappearance. Without him Fifa found that they had insufficient evidence to ban Garrincha, who played as Brazil beat Czechoslovakia 3-1 in the final. “It was me who won the World Cup,” Etzel later claimed, and he got more than that: it later transpired that he had given Marino only half of the cash, and kept the rest for himself. A fitting end to a remarkably lawless occasion.By Jimmy Hill, the Coventry City manager, 10 June 1962Some say Ken Aston should be given the V.C. for his heroic efforts to stem the battle between Chile and Italy last Saturday, others that the countries concerned should be banned for ever from world competition. Can we, 9,000 miles away and well informed through television’s magic, yet less hysterical than those whose judgement is obscured by the smoke from the battlefield, drive a wedge of reason through the week’s events?The game was rough enough to make Wilf Copping raise an eyebrow, punches were thrown frequently and boots were flying faster and more wildly than hooves in a cavalry charge. One cannot minimise the appalling lack of sportsmanship shown by the players, but this should not be taken as a license to denigrate soccer in this country.On the contrary a few days ago the English players were described by the Press as “too gentlemanly” to succeed in the World Cup. A fault suddenly becomes a virtue and the friendly handshakes exchanged with the Hungarians after their wonderful display is no longer a sign of weakness but strength.When one considers the merciless criticism that has to be endured by players and officials for failure at national level, there is some provocation for a “win at all costs” approach.The World Cup is a tough competition for men. Football is a physical game demanding great skill and artistry. Bodies were meant to clash and hacking was a cornerstone on which the game was built. It was also meant that tempers should be held and tactics should never be vicious or violent.The Italians started vigorously but became hysterical. No professional player, Latin-American or European, losers all sense of fair play and caution without a reason. The Italians had to win this match to stay in the competition. Ferrini had already been sent off. David, Italy’s right-back, faced with Sanchez, the outside-left of Chile, who was shielding the ball beneath his backside, hacked the ball clear at the fourth attempt. This was rugged, but only a shade away from legality – he did play the ball.Sanchez leaped from the floor with only his dignity injured and felled David with a smart left hook. Once the resultant melee had subsided, the Italians could not understand – and neither can I – why Sanchez had been allowed to remain on the field despite a passable imitation of Rocky Marciano, when one of their number had been banished for a less serious and far less obvious offence.From that moment the last semblance of control left both players and officials. It was an appalling decision to allow a player to remain on the field after such a blatant disregard for the laws. It is possible that Mr. Ashton’s gaze had followed the ball as it rolled clear, but the linesman was standing within a few yards of the incident and could not have been unsighted.The players will have to shoulder most of the blame, but the officials must face up to their responsibility for making this grotesque decision. To make matters worse David himself was later sent off for an interception made with his boot, head high, a dangerous manoeuvre when all’s said and done, but he did lunge at the ball and make contact with it.Mr Ashton showed commendable restraint and determination to see the game through, but one wonders whether this game was worth such care and attention. His courage cannot be doubted but on this score the coup de grace would have been to have sent off a Chilean.Normally a referee can add strength to a decision by delivering a few well chosen words to an offending player. When both speak different languages this aid to control is lost. It is only the whistle that communicates the referee’s personality and ability.Soon we must legislate for the use of filmed evidence in resultant inquiries and commissions, as is done in racing. If the magic eye of the camera can thus make the vicious and underhand player’s task more difficult, the sooner film is used the better.My own view is that the guilty individuals concerned in Saturday’s match should be made to sit silently and watch the film of their own antics a dozen times over. If this doesn’t shame them – nothing will.This article was amended on 5 March 2014 as Brazil beat Czechoslovakia, not Yugoslavia, in the final.

Simon BurntonThu, 22 Mar 2018
Source: The Guardian WC
Read story