AccaMate logo

Football News

Latest Sports Stories

Filtered by tag:Mikel ArtetaClear filter
Griping about Tuchel’s handbrake or Arteta’s bus makes the bantersphere tick | Max Rushden

Football News

Griping about Tuchel’s handbrake or Arteta’s bus makes the bantersphere tick | Max Rushden

Opinions, the game loves them, and after Arsenal’s hugely divisive final, here’s my truth – feel free to yell backWhat the world needs now is one last hot take on Arsenal and the Champions League final before we are all brought together in beautiful symbiotic harmony by the World Cup.Key questions such as: was it a good game? Was this the perfect way to take on the best midfield and attack in world football or the ultimate illustration of footballing cowardice? Why didn’t all the people in the UK want Arsenal to win? Why did some Arsenal fans find that annoying? Could it possibly be that people are different and want different things from football matches they consume in very different ways?The big question is about Arsenal’s approach to the final. I am not totally comfortable saying the words “game state” out loud, but it is clear Mikel Arteta had a decision to make once Arsenal went 1-0 up after six minutes. A decision, we presume, he had made a long time before Kai Havertz roofed it over Matvey Safonov and into the Paris Saint-Germain goal.Does he keep attacking or does he take the best defence in the world, who have won the Premier League by being defensively brilliant, and see whether PSG can break them down? It seems the most sensible decision he could make at that time.It is not without risks. Not having the ball is physically and mentally exhausting. PSG, despite not creating a clear chance in the first half, were so close with quite a few final balls. That is the hard bit of breaking down a low block: choosing when to try the difficult pass, choosing who makes it, choosing who receives it. That was this game in microcosm: move the defence around until a tiny gap appears.Parking the bus is often used as a criticism. But parking a bus is presumably incredibly difficult – as is maintaining your shape, keeping your discipline and deciding when you have to go to ground to block or make a last-ditch tackle. So maybe Arsenal did park the bus and maybe we’ve got that phrase wrong all along.But aren’t Arsenal the best team in the best league in the world? Surely they can offer more than that? It’s an understandable question. This Arsenal team were not going to go all-out attack, especially once they had a lead. So what’s the choice? Defend as they did or attack 5% or 10% more? What does that look like? And do you by definition leave yourself 5% or 10% more open, making those PSG final balls 5%-10% easier? Arsenal had the only other clear chance in the first half. It was almost perfect.It is fair to criticise Arteta’s substitutions and their inability to change things after the equaliser, but that is perhaps as much down to the fact that despite building a brilliant squad, with two excellent players in each position, they are a galático or two, or three, behind PSG.And it didn’t work. Eventually a through ball pierced the backline and Cristhian Mosquera fouled Khvicha Kvaratskhelia. PSG are better at football. That’s quite a key part in all of this.It feels as if this was Arteta’s best plan for winning the Champions League and to be clear I did not want Arsenal to win this game (although I’m not entirely sure I wanted PSG and their project to win it either).Was it a good game? Once Arsenal scored, I was completely invested in watching the best attack try to break down the best defence. Yet there is a high chance I’ve watched very similar games with teams in different shirts in different competitions and found them insipidly boring. There is a high chance I’ll watch England struggle to break down a low block in a few weeks’ time and start moaning about handbrakes (Handbremse, if you want to yell at Thomas Tuchel in his native tongue). I have four decades of match-worn scars watching the Three Lions do that.We don’t approach every game in the same way. Had this been Monday Night Football, after watching nine Premier League matches and a Cambridge game I’d have been checking my algorithm or hanging up the washing by the second half. But I gave it my full attention and found it compelling.Enjoying this game doesn’t mean you want every match to be like that. You don’t need to compare it with the PSG-Bayern Munich first leg. You probably don’t eat the same food at every meal. You can enjoy eggs and enjoy Haribo, ideally separately.There is always a danger I just want to take a different view on this game to appear more intelligent than I am, to be the thinking man’s observer of football. Do I want a thousand likes? Or just a WhatsApp from Rory Smith agreeing with me? Hopefully, this is my truth.Then to the endless wider reaction. Enter the bantersphere. You may live an Instagram-free life and just be left to develop your own opinions or you may find yourself doomscrolling on the toilet. What does that ubiquitous Manchester City fan with his bottle think? Oh, it’s my colleagues Jason Cundy and Gabby Agbonlahor dancing around the TalkSport office in PSG shirts.What does Chris Sutton think about what Martin Keown thinks about what Jack Whitehall thinks about what Jeff Stelling thinks about Arsenal? Perhaps you’re agreeing with Ollie Holt that it’s sad that not every English person wanted Arsenal to win. You could be drowning in your own myopic club podcasts or listening to and shouting at mine.Whatever your view of the final, you don’t have to go out of your way to find an opinion you will find annoying. Perhaps this article is the very thing. Then you have a choice: to quietly disagree and put your phone away or yell back. Perhaps football has always been this way.Even if you just didn’t get a dopamine hit when you yelled it to yourself in your living room, you were still a content creator. Now it’s just created for all of us, by all of us, all the time, and not even Arteta can park a big enough bus to keep it out.

Max RushdenThu, 04 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
If Arsenal have made most of their resources, is this as good as it gets? | Jonathan Liew

Football News

If Arsenal have made most of their resources, is this as good as it gets? | Jonathan Liew

Thirst for renewal is strong and new players could help bridge the gap to PSG but there are no guaranteesThe greatest lie ever told about penalty shootouts is that they are a lottery. This is a recognisable and trainable footballing skill, a test not just of ball-striking and placement but research, psychology, mettle under pressure. Eberechi Eze puts the ball wide, Gabriel Magalhães sends it in the direction of the Danube: this is failure on the most brutal and unforgiving terms. But it is failure nonetheless.The second greatest lie ever told about penalties is that fortune plays no part. Any encounter decided by 10 kicks of a football will evidently be at the disproportionate mercy of random factors: the divot, the bad contact, the goalkeeper’s guesswork (and to all the preparation that goes into the process, it remains partly guesswork). That this sport – already a sport of low scores, narrow differentials and infinite variables – chooses to decide its biggest prizes on these smallest of morsels is one of its cruellest traits.Were Arsenal unlucky in Budapest, then? Once we sieve out the righteous rage and endless counterfactuals, the minor quibbles over major refereeing calls, Arsenal probably got what they deserved. To lose on penalties after making the defending champions sweat and fluster for 120 minutes is undoubtedly harsh. But by the same token it is hard to escape the conclusion that – through their tactics and their gameplan and their mindset – Arsenal largely brought themselves to this point.In its purest essence, and against the best opponents, Mikel Arteta’s style of football is geared explicitly towards narrowing the range of realistic outcomes, and then catching the breaks that remain. But a strategy calibrated to earn and defend a 1-0 lead, with four centre-halves and a low block, stands or falls by those same stark measures. Fine-margins football is all very well, until you find yourself on the wrong end of fine margins.Was any other approach remotely plausible? Probably not. Bayern Munich in the semi-final showed up the limitations of going toe-to-toe with Paris Saint-Germain on their own terms. And of course Arsenal do not possess a Michael Olise, a Harry Kane, a Luis Díaz, a philosophy based on drilled waves of lawless attack. They were missing their top two right-backs, and finished the game with a front three of Gabriel Martinelli, Noni Madueke and Viktor Gyökeres, which should at least contextualise what it was fair to expect from Arteta here.The gulf in resources is obviously a factor here, but so too the gulf in priorities. Arsenal’s recruitment in the last few windows has put a premium on bolstering the back line, adding depth, bringing up the overall level of the squad rather than signing the electrifying X-factor players who can win a big game with a moment of brilliance. Perhaps this is a strategy that met its match here. Perhaps this was a night when Bukayo Saka and Leandro Trossard, Martinelli and Madueke and Gyökeres – fine players all – were exposed just a little, handed the biggest stage in the world, and not quite filling it.Certainly this appeared to be the subtext of Arteta’s post-match reflections, when he spoke of “needing to improve” and “find different margins”. Arteta gushed about the talent at Luis Enrique’s disposal, lamented the way they warp the gravity of the game around them, force opponents to play in their least favourite areas of the field.And there appears to be a prevailing assumption that having finally broken their Premier League drought, with a squad approaching peak age, having pushed the best team in the world to their very last drop of sweat, Arsenal will surely take the final step before long. That this is just the start of the Arteta golden age. All of which may well come to pass. And yet it’s also worth asking: what if it isn’t? What if this is as good as it gets?For, buried within the eulogies and paeans to this side, is a kind of paradox. We are told that this is a team who – through good coaching, a good culture and a sound process – have made the very most of the resources at their disposal, allowing them to compete with the continent’s finest megaclubs and state-owned vehicles. And yet, we are also told by many of the same people, this is also a team with ample capacity for improvement in the coming years. Think about it. Can both these things really be true at once? If Arteta has squeezed every last drop of potential out of this squad, how likely is it that there are still levels to find? What if this is a club already operating at 105% of their capacity?The thirst for renewal is strong. New players will surely help to bridge the gap, and yet the cautionary tale of Liverpool last summer is a reminder that this process is rarely straightforward or devoid of risk. World-class players necessitate an enhanced wage structure, new tactical shades and notes, a subtly different dressing-room dynamic. A club as well run as Arsenal can count on signing more hits than misses. But the bigger the stakes, the bigger the risks.Meanwhile, clubs who can rely on the largesse of a state have much fatter margins for error. An expensive misstep on the scale of the Neymar/Messi/Mbappé fiasco would derail most clubs for a decade. Paris, on the other hand, can simply shrug it off and go again. Manchester City can drop £59m on Omar Marmoush, £50m on Nico González, £46m on Tijjani Reijnders, £27m on James Trafford, with no real urgency for any of them to work out.Beyond these two, many of the continent’s sleeping giants have ample room for improvement. Bayern Munich and Barcelona are clearly close. Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool and Real Madrid are all capable of waking from their slumber in a hurry. Future generations may marvel at Arsenal’s fortune in reaching a Champions League final by beating Bayer Leverkusen, Sporting Lisbon and Atlético Madrid. Will the circumstances really be any more favourable for them next time?Arsenal had a strong claim to be Europe’s best team this season. And while it may be some comfort to their fans and staff that they came so close, they will also need to realise the window of opportunity at the very highest level is vanishingly small, contingent on luck as well as skill, and has no guarantees of coming again. And if that doesn’t focus minds during the long summer months, nothing will.

Jonathan LiewMon, 01 Jun 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Arteta urges Arsenal to use Champions League final pain against PSG and ‘turn it into fuel’

Football News

Arteta urges Arsenal to use Champions League final pain against PSG and ‘turn it into fuel’

‘We will have to improve to try to get a different outcome’Manager unhappy Arsenal not given extra-time penaltyMikel Arteta spoke of his heartache after a skied penalty from Gabriel Magalhães in the shootout against Paris Saint-Germain ended Arsenal’s hopes of being crowned European champions for the first time, but emphasised the need to take that pain “and turn it into fuel”.Kai Havertz’s early strike and a defensive masterclass in the first half of the Champions League final that frustrated the holders had Arsenal supporters dreaming of a double after their first Premier League title for 22 years. But PSG hit back in the second half through Ousmane Dembélé from the spot before Arsenal thought they should have had a penalty of their own at the end of the first half of extra time.Arteta was booked for his protests after Noni Madueke tangled with Nuno Mendes. He then watched David Raya pull off a brilliant save from Mendes in the shootout after Eberechi Eze had put his spot-kick wide. It came down to Arsenal’s fifth penalty from Gabriel and the Brazilian was inconsolable after sending his effort over the bar.“Pain, that’s it,” said Arteta when asked to sum up his emotions. “When you are so close in the competition, and you are a few penalties away from winning the biggest club competition, that’s the way we should feel.”He added: “First of all you have to go through that pain, digest it, and turn it into fuel. To improve and to reach a different level, because it would demand a different level with the quality around Europe. I want to congratulate PSG because they are in my opinion the best team in the world.”Luis Enrique’s side have become only the ninth club in the competition’s history to retain their title and only the second in the Champions League era. But Arteta was disappointed that the German referee, Daniel Siebert, decided against awarding a penalty when Madueke went down in the area under pressure from Mendes.“I watched all the penalties in the competition in the last 72 hours, but that easily can be a penalty,” he said. “It is not what happened and that’s it. We will have to improve to try and get a different outcome. I will take a few days with my family and then we will start the process to review what we’ve done and decide to make some very important decisions if we want to reach another level.”Declan Rice admitted coming so close was a difficult pill to swallow but backed Arsenal to bounce back. “We will try to take some perspective from how far we have come as a group,” the England midfielder said. “Some of the best teams ever have lost on penalties in finals. It’s cruel, but that’s football. The manager has told us how much he loves us as a group. This is only the start for us.”Luis Enrique, who started with the same outfield players who defeated Inter 5-0 in last year’s final and has now won the Champions League three times, paid tribute to Arsenal’s defensive efforts.“Maybe today both teams deserved to win, but the way we played the whole season, I think we deserve it,” he said. “We are used to attacking [against a low block] but they are strong physically, they know how to defend and it was very tough. We’ll try to do it again next year. Why not?”

Ed Aarons at the Puskas ArenaSat, 30 May 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
Arteta insists Arsenal’s ‘ambition is bigger’ for Champions League glory after title win

Football News

Arteta insists Arsenal’s ‘ambition is bigger’ for Champions League glory after title win

Gunners face PSG in Budapest final on Saturday‘We have one, and now we want the second one’Mikel Arteta has dismissed suggestions the pressure is off Arsenal in Saturday’s Champions League final after their first Premier League title for 22 years and insists he and his players are hungry for more trophies.Paris Saint-Germain, who defeated Arsenal in the semi-finals last year before being crowned European champions for the first time, saw off Chelsea, Liverpool and Bayern Munich in the knockout stages and are strongly fancied to retain their crown. Jurriën Timber looks likely to start after Arteta confirmed the Netherlands defender had recovered from a groin injury, although he has not featured since the win over Everton on 14 March.Arsenal have yet to win the Champions League and reached the final on one previous occasion, in 2006, when they were defeated by Barcelona. Arteta is determined Arsenal seize their opportunity on the biggest stage in club football after finally ending their long wait for the league title.“The ambition is bigger,” the manager said. “We have one, and now we want the second one. That’s all we’ve been talking about. There has to be a platform to reach bigger destinations and to aim for more. And the team is capable, because we’ve shown it in the last two seasons, in this competition. What we’ve done this season in the competition, and I want the players to be so confident that we’re going to win.”Arteta, asked whether he had noticed something different when he looks in the eyes of his players, said: “That they want more. Going through those moments brings you a different kind of desire. Because you lift it, you know exactly how it feels. You want to reproduce that feeling as many times as possible.“We have the opportunity to write a new chapter in the history of this football club. And in order to do that, we have to play with such clarity, a lot of courage, and a relentless desire to win. We have those three aspects, and I’m sure we’re going to be close to winning.”Bukayo Saka, who scored Arsenal’s goal in last season’s 3-1 aggregate defeat by PSG, revealed that Thierry Henry – part of the team that lost to Barcelona 20 years ago – had been in touch this week to offer encouragement. The England forward said it would round off a perfect season if they can beat PSG and that winning the Premier League after finishing second three years in a row had given the players plenty of confidence.“We all know where my journey started as a seven- or eight-year-old at Hale End – it was a long, long way away from trying to win the Champions League with Arsenal,” he said. “It feels like this last week it’s all become a reality and tomorrow is another exciting opportunity to create more history and win another for the club that I love. That goes a long way and it helped us win the title and hopefully it will give us an advantage on the pitch here.”Saturday’s game will be Arsenal’s 63rd of the season, more than any other team from the top five European leagues. It will be PSG’s 56th but Saka insisted fatigue would not play a part.“We’ve had a week to recover and we’re ready to go again and a game like this is not going to be decided on minutes,” he said. “It will be decided on moments and which team can produce a bit of quality and be well organised.”

Ed Aarons in BudapestFri, 29 May 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
PSG’s motivation greater than Arsenal’s desire for first title, says Luis Enrique

Football News

PSG’s motivation greater than Arsenal’s desire for first title, says Luis Enrique

Luis Enrique: ‘Retaining it is source of inspiration for us’Expects to name same outfield 10 as in 2025 finalLuis Enrique has insisted Paris Saint-Germain’s motivation to retain their Champions League title is greater than Arsenal’s quest to be crowned European champions for the first time.PSG demolished Inter 5-0 in last year’s final in Munich and are strong favourites for Saturday’s showdown at the Puskas Arena in Budapest. Arsenal have reached this stage for the first time since 2006, when they lost 2-1 to Barcelona in Paris, and Arteta caused a stir in the week when he said: “We will be European champions on Saturday.”Luis Enrique refused to say if that declaration has provided his players with extra motivation but did say that the chance to become only the second team in the Champions League era to retain their title, after Real Madrid, and ninth in total is driving his players. “Yes, it is powerful,” said the Spaniard of Arsenal’s desire to win a first title. “But do you know how powerful trying to win the second one in a row is? It’s bigger. So we’re ahead. I don’t think there’s any better motivation than winning the Champions League. We will see tomorrow who is better – we both won our respective leagues and I’m going to focus on what is positive for my team. So that we can show the best of ourselves.“It’s a source of motivation for us. We have already gone down in the history books as one of the best teams in Europe. But that’s what we’re looking for. You never know when you’re going to be back in the Champions League final and you have to make the most of it.”Ousmane Dembélé and Achraf Hakimi have been included in PSG’s squad for the final after recovering from injury, with Luis Enrique – who has won 11 of the 12 finals he has contested as a manager – expected to select 10 of the team that started in Munich 12 months ago. Dembélé’s participation was in doubt due to a calf injury but the France forward said he was never worried about missing the final and warned that PSG are itching to finish the job.“We’re a young squad who are highly ambitious and we don’t want to sit on our laurels,” he said. “We know that it would be something historic if we can pull it off. If we want to be great players then these are the trophies that we need to be winning time and again.”

Ed Aarons in BudapestFri, 29 May 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story
‘He was alive – you saw it in his eyes’: inside the years that shaped Mikel Arteta

Football News

‘He was alive – you saw it in his eyes’: inside the years that shaped Mikel Arteta

In the runup to the Champions League final, the Arsenal manager’s first footballing steps in the Basque Country and Barcelona are recalled by those who shared themThe way Santi Cazorla tells it, rolling about laughing, Mikel Arteta may just be the worst person you could ever wish to watch a match with. Which is why he knew his friend would be a coach and why he told him to go away and become one, convinced great things were coming. “When we were injured at Arsenal, we used to meet at home for games, and he would grab the remote and pause it,” Cazorla recalls. “I would say: ‘What are you stopping it for?’ He would say: ‘No, go back, go back,’ rewind it 30 seconds, and then ask: ‘What do you see?’ I would say: ‘I see a paused screen. I don’t see anything!’”So Arteta would explain. “‘Don’t you think this player is badly positioned? … If he goes a bit deeper, this space opens up … if the pivot goes there, this happens … that line should be deeper …’ I would look at him and think: ‘What’s with this guy?’” Cazorla continues, still cracking up. “He was a coach already. All game, every game: pausing, rewinding. The match is finished and we’re only in the 35th minute. ‘Do you see it?’ ‘Yes, yes, you’re right, now come on, press play.’ But I didn’t see it. I love football, I can watch it all day, but I don’t notice those things. Mikel does. I think it’s a gift.”Born in Gipuzkoa, the smallest province in Spain and an outlier producing a quantity of elite managers that invites an investigation, Arteta was always a bit different; everyone says so. Which isn’t to say that those who shared his first steps saw what Cazorla did, still less the coach who leads Arsenal into the Champions League final. Fond though they are, and there is warmth in every word, most didn’t see a coach just yet, but they saw something. Not talent exactly, although that too, but something else a little deeper, lasting.“Mikel caught your attention very young,” Jon Ayerbe says. “The word I’d use is alive; you saw it in his eyes. He grasped everything fast, had character and was so competitive. Give him the ball, he’ll find a solution. And he was a year younger than us, eh.”“Above all, he was the most intelligent,” Álvaro Parra adds. Mikel Yanguas says: “You looked at him and thought: ‘Bloody hell, he’s got something special. If anyone makes it, it’s him.’ He had personality, ambition.” Ayerbe, Parra and Yanguas played with Arteta at Antiguoko, a youth club in San Sebastián that took on professional academies and won.Arteta was good enough at tennis to have pursued a different path, his father making him choose his sport, and Antiguoko’s former coach Roberto Montiel enjoys recounting an Arteta goal against Real Sociedad, all cheek and technique, that reminds him of Lionel Messi. Arteta was two-footed and tiny then, a No 10 who later became a No 4, and “a born sportsman”, Montiel says. He was dedicated and smart, too. “He was always clear he would make it and sacrificed his life for it,” Parra says. “He went to Barcelona, leaving everything behind. And later he turned down lucrative offers – Dubai, Qatar, the US – to work with Guardiola at Man City because it was the right step.”At 14, Arteta had begun training at Athletic Club, 100km west along the AP-8. There, one of his coaches was the future Athletic, Eibar, Sevilla and Olympiakos manager José Luis Mendilibar, who was struck by this kid that never lost the ball and always played with clarity and sense. “What you could imagine, thinking about it now, was that someone with that intelligence and understanding would also develop an ability to explain it to others, so they could understand too,” Mendilibar wrote later. That sentiment is echoed by Luis Fernández, the coach who signed an 18-year-old Arteta for Paris Saint-Germain in 2001. “When you told him what you wanted, he did it first time,” Fernández says.By then, Barcelona had shaped him too, the first formative experience away from home. “It was 1997,” Yanguas recalls. “Someone saw us representing Gipuzkoa at an Easter tournament and invited us to a trial at Barcelona. We stayed near Pedralbes and at the end they said yes to the three of us: me, Mikel and Jon Álvarez. We left that summer: 17 August, the day of San Sebastián’s fiestas, so I remember it well.”They moved into La Masia, the traditional Catalan farmhouse alongside the Camp Nou that was Barcelona’s spiritual home and an actual home to 32 boys aged 11 to 18, three or four of whom were basketball players. Andrés Iniesta, Carles Puyol and Iván de la Peña were among them. Pepe Reina would become one of Arteta’s closest friends. Each dorm had four bunks, a couple of camp beds sometimes squeezed in too. Through the window they could see the pitch where Bobby Robson’s team trained. Well, part of it: a screen covered half.“It was just us, the cooks, the security guard and one guy overseeing everything,” says Roberto Trashorras, who became close to Arteta. “It’s totally different nowadays. We sorted things out among ourselves. Because we were alone, we looked after each other. There were no mobiles. I remember queueing at midnight to ring home from the payphone, Puyol and De la Peña ahead of me. We were teenagers, so there’d be the usual messing about: jokes, water bombs. Mikel was funny, extroverted, but we were the victims usually … until you get a bit older and it’s your turn.”A bus took them to school – parents chose between three options – they would train and then … well, not much, Yanguas says. “We would go to [the department store] El Corte Inglés; we were from San Sebastián, a small city, and we didn’t have an El Corte Inglés there. Or we’d go to the cinema. I remember seeing Titanic with Mikel, Victor Valdés, Fernando Macedo. At weekends your parents would come.”They were 15 and, looking back, Yanguas admits he wasn’t ready. Although that cadete (under-16) team were national champions, he returned to San Sebastián at the end of the first year. “It was hard for me,” he says. “I think about it now and I was an introvert. Mikel was different, better prepared: more outgoing, more adaptable, better at relating. Maybe inside he was struggling but we saw someone who handled it very well. On the pitch too: he would demand the ball. I thought it was natural then but I coach now and realise it’s not. No one offers, no one asks for the ball. Mikel did constantly. It’s hard to do that: ‘Give it to me, I’ll sort this.’ He was surrounded by great players but had the confidence and self assurance to do that.”Jofre Mateu was two years older than Arteta, with whom he would play in the B team, and had already made a first-team appearance. “Mikel used to laugh about his hair. He said he had ‘bull’s hair’: so hard and it didn’t move. But, honestly, the thing I most remember is that one day he took my car when he was learning or recently passed and crashed it into the Masia wall.” Jofre laughs. “It was three metres, impossible to crash. Impossible. And he goes: ‘Nah, nah, relax, I-don’t-know-what.’ He puts his arm on the window, looks back to reverse, but he’s putting it in first. ‘Yeah, I think you need more lessons. You can take taxis from now on.’ My car was only two months old: a VW Golf.”Which raises an obvious question: are you stupid? “Totally,” Jofre says. But, actually, handing over the keys wasn’t a risk: if anything defined Arteta, he says, it was how sensible he was. “He wasn’t there to piss about, he was there to do the right thing,” Jofre says. “He was super-responsible, he had something.”In fact, another scene defines Arteta better. “Thiago Motta was hot-headed and in a training session he got in a fight, which wasn’t unusual,” Jofre says. “I don’t remember who with, but it wasn’t Mikel, yet he steps in: ‘Thiago, man, you’re teammates: you can’t do this.’ I remember it because Mikel didn’t really have the ‘weight’ to do that. It would be like Marc Bernal standing up to, say, Gavi now. He didn’t do it in an ugly way, but he did it. Clearly, firmly. And we just all stopped. Like: ‘Olé tus huevos [Good on ya].’ I think that said something about him: he wasn’t the star, but he’s not going to let that happen.”La Masia was a footballing education, entirely new. “The players who arrive are the best in their teams but Barcelona make you think about tactics, space in a way that’s not normal,” says Luis Carrión, a Barcelona B teammate. “At Antiguoko, Mikel would have had the ball all the time; here he had to wait, occupy the right space. By standing still, you see a solution, a way out. They’d explain concepts – third man, triangles, final line – but it wasn’t ‘classes’, more repetition: passing drills every day.”Trashorras says: “Mikel was a dribbler, arriving in the area, but he learned to play one, two touches, not lose his position. One of the things that most struck me when I first got there is they would say: ‘Don’t go looking for the ball, the ball will come to you.’ ‘Yeah, but, it’s just there, I can …’ ‘No, no, no. Don’t invade someone else’s space.’ It can be hard to adapt but Mikel was sharp. It’s really, genuinely different. Pffff, it’s like a religion. And then when you leave it’s different too.”Not that Barcelona’s creed was Arteta’s only faith. There is a simple reason why he didn’t make it in Catalonia, or two of them – Xavi Hernández and Iniesta – but there was a world out there, ideas and character shaped across four countries, experiences in Spain, France, Scotland and England. “When I became PSG coach I asked for Mikel because I watched him in the juvenil [under-19s],” Fernández says. “I followed Johan Cruyff’s ideas, the importance of the pivot, loved Pep Guardiola and wanted a player of that type.“On the pitch you see Mikel’s intelligence, his understanding and, for sure, that comes out later when he becomes a coach. He had the perfect attitude to coach: professionalism. He was responsible, listened, learned and you didn’t need to keep telling him. He was an example for everyone. I admire him. I’m sensitive and when I see him and Gabi [Heinze], his very good friend in Paris, it makes me so happy. If you had asked me then if he would be a coach, I’d have said: ‘No.’ He wasn’t: ‘Do this, do that.’ I think he learned with Pep. I went to see him do a session and thought: ‘Bloody hell, look at Mikel.’ But it was always in him.”It just had to come out. “He was a kid with personality: polite, very professional for his age,” Carrión says. “A coach? You never know, but he watched a lot of football. I ran into him recently and we chatted about football; it’s always football.” With time, Yanguas suggests, you learn to express, understand and analyse the spaces you saw naturally, and Arteta always saw those. Focus and passion came as standard. Jofre, asked if he saw a coach in Arteta, replies: “Zero. But if you asked me about Xavi, I would have said zero. Luis Enrique, zero. Guardiola … OK, yes. But we were kids still, teenagers at La Masia more interested in the next game, some girl or where we’re going on Saturday.” Trashorras agrees: “With Pep, you saw it; with Mikel I couldn’t claim to have done, but you can’t argue with what he’s done.” In part because Pep did see it.And so, via Paris, Glasgow and Liverpool to Santi’s sofa in London, an offer and a new era, the other Arteta that was always inside somewhere. “We confided in each other; he was the captain, always looked after me and my family and helped so much during my injury,” Cazorla recalls. “He said: ‘What should I do, Santi? Keep playing, which I like most, or take the opportunity as Pep’s assistant?’ I love playing but there’s no better place to start coaching and I have a good relationship with him.’ I said: ‘Mikel, if that’s what moves you, go for it.’ It’s a difficult step but I was sure it would work. I would watch him pausing games and think: this guy is already a coach. I’d tell him: ‘You’re thinking beyond what a player does.’ And he would say: ‘Yeah, I see things that make me think I should be a coach. I feel that I am.’”

Sid LoweFri, 29 May 2026
Source: The Guardian
Read story